Teams

SFV - Hit & Run

2022 Adult 40 & Over - SFV · SFV 40 & Over - Women 3.0

13 players · average NTRP 3.25 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2022-03-26vs SFV - Warner WarriorsLost 01
L#1 SinglesMelissa Jansson vs Lourdes Price7-6, 0-6, 0-1
2022-03-05vs SFV - NetchicksLost 01
L#2 DoublesKim Bracken / Melissa Jansson vs Jennifer Williams / Caroline Nold4-6, 4-6
L#1 DoublesMelissa Jansson / Keiko Kato Verrier vs Summer Williamson / Jenny Isaacson3-6, 1-6
2022-02-06Won 10
W#1 SinglesMelissa Jansson vs Rebakah Amirkhizi6-1, 2-6, 1-0
2022-01-09vs SFV - Rally GirlsLost 01
L#1 SinglesMelissa Jansson vs Angelina Smith3-6, 7-5, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for SFV 40 & Over - Women 3.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.72 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.36
Margie Englis
published 3.5
Holly Culhane
published 3.5
3.10
Keiko Kato Verrier
published
2.84
Melissa Jansson
usually #1 Singles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 3
2.83
Larissa Kazantsev
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
2.70
Letty King
published
2.66
Molly Jackson
published
2.65
Zenaida Siojo
published
2.60
Pamela Bentley
published
2.58
Gloria Cardoza
published 3
2.52
Tes MacAraya
published
2.50
Robina Markarian
published
2.38
Liyan Wang
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Margie Englis
169W–111L career · no lines in 2022
<1%86%14%
3.36
3.5
Holly Culhane
1W–0L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Keiko Kato Verrier
5W–6L career · no lines in 2022
23%77%<1%
3.10
3
Melissa Jansson
45W–36L career · 5 lines in 2022
<1%89%10%
2.84
Larissa Kazantsev
74W–65L career · 6 lines in 2022
1%90%9%
2.83
Letty King
5W–6L career · no lines in 2022
6%93%1%
2.70
Molly Jackson
14W–16L career · no lines in 2022
11%88%<1%
2.66
Zenaida Siojo
9W–17L career · no lines in 2022
12%88%<1%
2.65
Pamela Bentley
9W–7L career · no lines in 2022
23%77%<1%
2.60
3
Gloria Cardoza
7W–8L career · no lines in 2022
28%72%<1%
2.58
Tes MacAraya
1W–4L career · no lines in 2022
45%55%<1%
2.52
Robina Markarian
2W–9L career · no lines in 2022
51%49%<1%
2.50
Liyan Wang
0W–5L career · no lines in 2022
82%18%<1%
2.38

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.