Teams

SFV LLW - Simply Smashing - Allison MacEwan

2022 Adult 40 & Over - SFV · SFV 40 & Over - Women 3.0

12 players · average NTRP 3.00 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2022-03-27Won 10
W#2 DoublesJulie Arshonsky / Stella Dumlao-Idea vs Jean Anker / Sima Hakimi6-3, 6-0
2022-03-06vs SFV - Chicks With SticksLost 01
L#3 DoublesDeidre Hope / Barb Jepson vs Kathryn Speer / Julie Whitmer2-6, 6-4, 0-1
2022-02-12vs SFV - Hit & RunWon 20
W#2 DoublesDeidre Hope / Barb Jepson vs Molly Jackson / Margie Englis6-2, 6-1
W#3 DoublesAmeline Suson / Eliza Llobrera vs Zenaida Siojo / Tes MacAraya7-5, 6-2
2022-02-06vs SFV - NetchicksWon 10
W#2 DoublesSummer Williamson / Stella Dumlao-Idea vs Jennifer Williams / Caroline Nold6-1, 6-1
2022-01-15vs SFV - NetchicksWon 10
W#3 DoublesEliza Llobrera / Barb Jepson vs Jonae Fedors / Jennifer Williams6-4, 6-3
2022-01-08vs SFV - Chicks With SticksLost 01
L#3 DoublesVanessa Nelson / Eliza Llobrera vs Hanan Asfoury / Lina Gomez7-5, 3-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for SFV 40 & Over - Women 3.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.94 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.83
Summer Williamson
published
3.72
Jenny Isaacson
published
3.02
Julie Arshonsky
usually #1 Doubles 47%, also #3 Doubles 41% · published 3
2.84
Stella Dumlao-Idea
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.81
Deidre Hope
published 3
2.79
Eliza Llobrera
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
ANALILY PARK
published 3
2.75
Barb Jepson
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.68
Susan Mondt
published
2.64
Ameline Suson
published 3
2.63
Allison Mac Ewan
published 3
2.63
Vanessa Nelson
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Deidre Hope + Julie Arshonsky5652% games+0.5% vs expected
Eliza Llobrera + Ameline Suson123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Summer Williamson
49W–27L career · no lines in 2022
1%90%10%
3.83
Jenny Isaacson
22W–19L career · no lines in 2022
5%94%2%
3.72
3
Julie Arshonsky
130W–102L career · 17 lines in 2022
<1%42%58%
3.02
3
Stella Dumlao-Idea
180W–184L career · 6 lines in 2022
<1%89%11%
2.84
3
Deidre Hope
20W–18L career · no lines in 2022
1%92%7%
2.81
3
Eliza Llobrera
121W–89L career · 3 lines in 2022
1%93%5%
2.79
3
ANALILY PARK
2W–4L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
3
Barb Jepson
70W–61L career · 3 lines in 2022
3%95%3%
2.75
Susan Mondt
10W–13L career · no lines in 2022
8%91%1%
2.68
3
Ameline Suson
4W–6L career · no lines in 2022
15%85%<1%
2.64
3
Allison Mac Ewan
2W–4L career · no lines in 2022
15%84%<1%
2.63
Vanessa Nelson
7W–13L career · no lines in 2022
16%84%<1%
2.63

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.