Teams

SFV - Chicks With Sticks

2022 Adult 40 & Over - SFV · SFV 40 & Over - Women 3.0

12 players · average NTRP 3.20 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2022-03-20vs SFV - Warner WarriorsWon 10
W#2 DoublesTANIA JANICEK / Christina Pula vs Shari Heinsius / Karen Crosby6-2, 6-3
W#1 DoublesTricia Kim / Jenny Ulch vs Julie Arshonsky / Jenny Isaacson6-3, 6-3
W#1 SinglesTANIA JANICEK vs ANALILY PARK6-0, 6-3
2022-02-27vs SFV - Hit & RunWon 10
W#1 DoublesTricia Kim / Jenny Ulch vs Letty King / Vanessa Rodriguez7-6, 6-4
2022-02-20vs SFV - NetchicksLost 01
L#1 DoublesTANIA JANICEK / Hanan Asfoury vs Jennifer Williams / Caroline Nold5-7, 6-1, 0-1
2022-02-12vs SFV - Warner WarriorsWon 10
W#2 DoublesTANIA JANICEK / Amy Randles vs Christine Whigham / Jo Ann Thrailkill6-4, 4-6, 1-0
2022-01-29vs SFV - NetchicksLost 01
L#2 DoublesLina Gomez / TANIA JANICEK vs Debora Townson / ZELMA HIGGS2-6, 5-7
2022-01-23Won 10
W#1 SinglesTANIA JANICEK vs Kim Bracken6-1, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for SFV 40 & Over - Women 3.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.03 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.77
Kathryn Speer
published
3.55
Tricia Kim
published
3.42
Jenny Ulch
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.26
Sara Lavalle
published
3.26
TANIA JANICEK
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 3.5
2.86
Amy Randles
published 3
2.85
Hanan Asfoury
published 3
2.82
Julie Whitmer
published
2.77
Leslie Byrum
published
2.63
Penny Oxciano
published
2.60
Jenny Killgore
published
2.54
Cherie Lakin
published 3
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kathryn Speer
5W–6L career · no lines in 2022
2%94%4%
3.77
Tricia Kim
9W–8L career · no lines in 2022
34%66%<1%
3.55
3.5
Jenny Ulch
70W–36L career · 3 lines in 2022
<1%72%28%
3.42
Sara Lavalle
9W–4L career · no lines in 2022
2%94%3%
3.26
3.5
TANIA JANICEK
102W–89L career · 6 lines in 2022
2%94%3%
3.26
3
Amy Randles
8W–8L career · no lines in 2022
<1%85%14%
2.86
3
Hanan Asfoury
11W–9L career · no lines in 2022
<1%87%13%
2.85
Julie Whitmer
13W–9L career · no lines in 2022
1%91%9%
2.82
Leslie Byrum
6W–7L career · no lines in 2022
2%94%4%
2.77
Penny Oxciano
8W–19L career · no lines in 2022
16%84%<1%
2.63
Jenny Killgore
2W–7L career · no lines in 2022
21%78%<1%
2.60
3
Cherie Lakin
2W–8L career · no lines in 2022
38%62%<1%
2.54

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.