Teams

Renwick/Maddaleni/Nashville

2026 Combo 18 & Over - Nashville · 7.5 Women - FRI AM

12 players · average NTRP 3.75 / TENNESSEE

View scouting list →
Schedule1 upcoming · 5 played
Sep 12 10:00 AM
Hadley Park Tennis Center
2026-08-29vs Glickman/NashvilleLost 12
L#1 DoublesEllie Kaplan / Sarah Lancaster vs Heather Brandon / Anna Hall2-6, 7-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesBrenda Maddaleni / Helen Suk vs Shari Glickman / Maggie McAfee0-6, 7-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesKristina Rogers / Lindsey Frye vs Perry Baltasar / Regan Baltasar6-0, 3-6, 0-1
2026-08-22vs Davis/Neal/NashvilleSplit 11
W#1 DoublesJade Skinner / Karen Martin vs Susannah Warfield / Jill Porter6-4, 1-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesSandra Francis / Lindsey Frye vs Kristen Morrison / JULIE GONTAREK7-6, 0-6, 0-1
2026-08-15vs Blevins/Thomas/NashvilleWon 21
W#1 DoublesSarah Lancaster / Ellie Kaplan vs Stacy Thomas / Jolene Chen7-5, 3-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesKaren Martin / Kristina Rogers vs Michelle Reyzer / Brandy Kennedy6-2, 6-4
L#3 DoublesBecky Morgan / Sandra Francis vs Ellen Gooden / Kelly Clapp1-6, 0-6
2026-08-11vs Kumar/NashvilleWon 30
W#1 DoublesPenelope Sevier / Ellie Kaplan vs Angela Blankenship / Tammy Shrivalle2-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#2 DoublesAnna Owings / Sandra Francis vs Nina Kumar / Sonja Plumlee6-3, 6-0
W#3 DoublesJade Skinner / Karen Martin vs Rene Fields / Jennifer Roh6-1, 6-3
2026-08-08vs Ossman/Fitzgerald/NashvilleLost 12
L#1 DoublesEllie Kaplan / Kristina Rogers vs Sara Gibbs / Sara Baker4-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesRachel Renwick / Jade Skinner vs Maura Fitzgerald / Stephanie Nelson7-6, 6-7, 1-0
L#3 DoublesPenelope Sevier / Brenda Maddaleni vs Maryam Khan / Caroline Lancaster3-6, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings7 teams · 7.5 Women - FRI AM
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Williams/Spalding/Nashville408413111
2Liles/Lee/Nashville2172464
3Shalk/Nashville2163873
4Renwick/Maddaleni/Nashville2163982
5Hambidge/Nashville21541294
6Hermann/Nashville1133863
7Conyers/Vogel/Nashville02061268

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.19 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Anna Owings
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
Helen Suk
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.63
Jade Skinner
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.28
Ellie Kaplan
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.27
Kristina Rogers
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.20
Sandra Francis
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.14
Penelope Sevier
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.10
Brenda Maddaleni
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
2.73
Becky Morgan
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Lucy McEuen
published
Rachel Renwick
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Sarah Lancaster
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Anna Owings
9W–6L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
4
Helen Suk
53W–42L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
4
Jade Skinner
8W–4L career · 3 lines in 2026
17%83%<1%
3.63
3.5
Ellie Kaplan
2W–2L career · type S · 4 lines in 2026
2%94%4%
3.28
Kristina Rogers
6W–11L career · 3 lines in 2026
2%94%4%
3.27
Sandra Francis
31W–80L career · 3 lines in 2026
6%93%1%
3.20
Penelope Sevier
22W–18L career · 4 lines in 2026
15%85%<1%
3.14
3.5
Brenda Maddaleni
26W–47L career · 4 lines in 2026
21%78%<1%
3.10
3.5
Becky Morgan
2W–10L career · type S · 1 line in 2026
98%2%<1%
2.73
Lucy McEuen
3W–17L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Rachel Renwick
1W–0L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
Sarah Lancaster
1W–1L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.