Teams

Ossman/Fitzgerald/Nashville

2026 Combo 18 & Over - Nashville · 7.5 Women - FRI AM

16 players · average NTRP 3.79 / TENNESSEE

View scouting list →
Schedule1 upcoming · 5 played
Sep 12 10:00 AM
Sequoia Swim and Tennis Club
2026-08-23vs Davis/Neal/NashvilleLost 03
L#1 DoublesMelinda Doty / Maryam Khan vs Elizabeth Davis / Erin Neal5-7, 1-6
L#2 DoublesBotum Chhay / Mary Freeman vs Kathy Anderson / Betsy Bernstein6-4, 2-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesSara Baker / Lily Qu vs Lisa Wallace / Lauren Pollard3-6, 4-6
2026-08-15vs Kumar/NashvilleLost 12
L#1 DoublesKelly Morris / Lily Qu vs Katie Morgan / Mallory Walsh3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#2 DoublesSara Gibbs / Cristi Plsek vs Rebekah Carroll / Stephanie Protz6-7, 3-6
W#3 DoublesMelinda Doty / Stephanie Nelson vs Jenny Neeley / Kristen Stovall6-4, 6-1
2026-08-08vs Renwick/Maddaleni/NashvilleWon 21
W#1 DoublesSara Gibbs / Sara Baker vs Ellie Kaplan / Kristina Rogers6-4, 6-4
L#2 DoublesMaura Fitzgerald / Stephanie Nelson vs Rachel Renwick / Jade Skinner6-7, 7-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesMaryam Khan / Caroline Lancaster vs Penelope Sevier / Brenda Maddaleni6-3, 6-0
2026-08-01vs Williams/Spalding/NashvilleLost 12
W#1 DoublesKelly Morris / Lily Qu vs Angela Case / Lynelle McDonald6-2, 6-0
L#2 DoublesSara Baker / Courtney Sweeney vs Joni Covington / Julie Harrington6-1, 3-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesNoi Sengsouk / Stephanie Nelson vs Chantel Wujtow / Jill Bratos2-6, 6-3, 1-0
2026-07-25vs Glickman/NashvilleWon 21
L#1 DoublesMaura Fitzgerald / Stephanie Nelson vs Heidi Nickel / Kim Miles0-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#2 DoublesKelly Morris / Lily Qu vs Kellie Walker / Traci Holton6-2, 3-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesSara Baker / Courtney Sweeney vs Heather Brandon / Lynn Blocher7-6, 2-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.5 Women - FRI AM have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.55 estimated across 15 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.27
Caroline Lancaster
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.88
Noi Sengsouk
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.75
Janet Adamson
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.75
Botum Chhay
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
Brenda Ossman
published 4
3.74
Becky Husi
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.70
Melinda Doty
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.70
Kelly Horna
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.62
Maura Fitzgerald
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.42
Sara Baker
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
3.37
Lily Qu
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
3.36
Sara Gibbs
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.35
Maryam Khan
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.27
Courtney Sweeney
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.10
Cristi Plsek
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.02
Elizabeth Stanley
published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Noi Sengsouk + Melinda Doty9169% games+11.5% vs expected
Sara Baker + Sara Gibbs12950% games+2.1% vs expected
Botum Chhay + Maura Fitzgerald5260% games−4.0% vs expected
Noi Sengsouk + Caroline Lancaster5071% gamesnot enough data
Noi Sengsouk + Janet Adamson213 matchesnot enough data
Caroline Lancaster + Janet Adamson213 matchesnot enough data
Kelly Horna + Janet Adamson303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Caroline Lancaster
20W–5L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%2%98%
4.27
Noi Sengsouk
32W–10L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%82%17%
3.88
Janet Adamson
44W–14L career · 3 lines in 2026
3%95%3%
3.75
4
Botum Chhay
16W–7L career · 1 line in 2026
3%95%3%
3.75
4
Brenda Ossman
1W–0L career · type S · no lines in 2026
not enough data
4
Becky Husi
14W–10L career · 1 line in 2026
3%95%2%
3.74
Melinda Doty
28W–14L career · 4 lines in 2026
6%93%1%
3.70
Kelly Horna
23W–23L career · 1 line in 2026
6%93%1%
3.70
Maura Fitzgerald
24W–22L career · 2 lines in 2026
19%81%<1%
3.62
Sara Baker
33W–20L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%73%27%
3.42
Lily Qu
24W–12L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%84%16%
3.37
Sara Gibbs
27W–15L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%85%14%
3.36
Maryam Khan
21W–14L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%88%12%
3.35
3.5
Courtney Sweeney
7W–5L career · type S · 2 lines in 2026
2%94%4%
3.27
3.5
Cristi Plsek
1W–3L career · 1 line in 2026
21%79%<1%
3.10
3.5
Elizabeth Stanley
16W–8L career · no lines in 2026
44%56%<1%
3.02

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.