Teams

Kumar/Nashville

2026 Combo 18 & Over - Nashville · 7.5 Women - FRI AM

16 players · average NTRP 3.75 / TENNESSEE

View scouting list →
Schedule1 upcoming · 5 played
Sep 12 10:00 AM
Hadley Park Tennis Center
2026-08-29vs Davis/Neal/NashvilleLost 01
L#2 DoublesJenny Neeley / Kristen Stovall vs Elizabeth Davis / Erin Neal0-6, 0-6
2026-08-22vs Blevins/Thomas/NashvilleLost 01
L#3 DoublesRebekah Carroll / Kristen Stovall vs Keri Cowles / Rachel Horres3-6, 6-4, 0-1
2026-08-15vs Ossman/Fitzgerald/NashvilleWon 21
W#1 DoublesKatie Morgan / Mallory Walsh vs Kelly Morris / Lily Qu3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#2 DoublesRebekah Carroll / Stephanie Protz vs Sara Gibbs / Cristi Plsek7-6, 6-3
L#3 DoublesJenny Neeley / Kristen Stovall vs Melinda Doty / Stephanie Nelson4-6, 1-6
2026-08-11vs Renwick/Maddaleni/NashvilleLost 02
L#1 DoublesAngela Blankenship / Tammy Shrivalle vs Penelope Sevier / Ellie Kaplan2-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#3 DoublesRene Fields / Jennifer Roh vs Jade Skinner / Karen Martin1-6, 3-6
2026-07-25vs Williams/Spalding/NashvilleSplit 11
L#2 DoublesKatie Morgan / Mallory Walsh vs Jill Bratos / Kristina Kamer7-6, 5-7, 0-1
W#3 DoublesRebekah Carroll / Stephanie Protz vs Aimee Lawson / Ellie Lawson6-2, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.5 Women - FRI AM have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.25 estimated across 16 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.51
Angela Blankenship
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.40
Lauren Wideman
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.35
Mallory Walsh
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.34
Nina Kumar
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.33
Susan Manley
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.31
Tammy Shrivalle
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.30
Marian Vangeli
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.25
Kristen Stovall
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.22
Rene Fields
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.21
Clair Bartholomew
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.19
Elizabeth Neighbors
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.17
Rebekah Carroll
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published
3.13
Jenny Neeley
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.13
Sonja Plumlee
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.13
Jennifer Roh
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.97
Stephanie Protz
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lauren Wideman + Nina Kumar11653% games+4.8% vs expected
Sonja Plumlee + Lauren Wideman5648% games+2.9% vs expected
Tammy Shrivalle + Marian Vangeli2448% games−0.2% vs expected
Marian Vangeli + Susan Manley4945% games−4.7% vs expected
Sonja Plumlee + Nina Kumar41140% games−6.2% vs expected
Tammy Shrivalle + Susan Manley2348% gamesnot enough data
Jenny Neeley + Kristen Stovall134 matchesnot enough data
Rene Fields + Susan Manley314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Angela Blankenship
21W–17L career · 1 line in 2026
46%54%<1%
3.51
Lauren Wideman
27W–26L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%75%25%
3.40
Mallory Walsh
9W–11L career · 2 lines in 2026
1%85%14%
3.35
Nina Kumar
36W–40L career · 2 lines in 2026
1%86%13%
3.34
Susan Manley
26W–41L career · 1 line in 2026
1%88%11%
3.33
Tammy Shrivalle
43W–59L career · 2 lines in 2026
1%90%9%
3.31
Marian Vangeli
19W–30L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%90%8%
3.30
Kristen Stovall
4W–11L career · 3 lines in 2026
4%93%3%
3.25
Rene Fields
7W–8L career · 1 line in 2026
6%92%2%
3.22
3.5
Clair Bartholomew
18W–25L career · 2 lines in 2026
6%92%2%
3.21
Elizabeth Neighbors
56W–32L career · 2 lines in 2026
9%90%1%
3.19
Rebekah Carroll
12W–8L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%11%89%
3.17
Jenny Neeley
16W–26L career · 3 lines in 2026
17%83%<1%
3.13
Sonja Plumlee
13W–23L career · 3 lines in 2026
17%83%<1%
3.13
Jennifer Roh
12W–11L career · 1 line in 2026
18%81%<1%
3.13
Stephanie Protz
29W–17L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%58%42%
2.97

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.