Teams

VCC RED

2023 USTA ADULT 18 & OVER - DEN · WOMEN 2.5 - 18 & OVER

5 players · average NTRP 3.00 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2023-05-24vs CCV GREENWon 10
W#1 SinglesAimee Madison vs Manuela Seewald6-4, 6-1
2023-05-22vs HV REDSplit 11
L#1 DoublesLauren Kauffman / Aimee Madison vs Leslie Clay / Hannah Quintana3-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesLindsey Bye / Kelli Fisher vs Cynthia Patton / Aaren Wiesler6-2, 6-1
2023-05-17vs SV REDLost 12
L#1 DoublesKaren Leach / Aimee Madison vs Lorri Basile / Laurie Lehmann6-2, 1-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesLindsey Bye vs Betsy Tapp6-3, 6-1
L#2 DoublesLauren Kauffman / Kristen Maley vs Whitney Coakley / Jill Nabena1-6, 2-6
2023-05-03vs HW GOLDSplit 11
L#1 SinglesAimee Madison vs Jamie Vonfeldt6-7, 6-3, 0-1
W#2 DoublesLindsey Bye / Lauren Kauffman vs Haley Evans / Blythe Leinwand5-7, 6-2, 1-0
2023-04-26vs SS-LT NAVYLost 01
L#2 DoublesKelli Fisher / Aimee Madison vs Nicki Erdle / Sarah Wells0-6, 2-6
2023-04-21vs CCV GREENLost 01
L#1 SinglesAimee Madison vs Lauren Behm5-7, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 2.5 - 18 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.57 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.80
Aimee Madison
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.65
Lindsey Bye
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 3
2.60
Stacy Johnson
published
2.48
Lauren Kauffman
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.31
Karen Leach
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Aimee Madison + Lauren Kauffman9849% games+2.2% vs expected
Lindsey Bye + Stacy Johnson2346% gamesnot enough data
Lindsey Bye + Lauren Kauffman314 matchesnot enough data
Stacy Johnson + Lauren Kauffman134 matchesnot enough data
Lindsey Bye + Aimee Madison303 matchesnot enough data
Stacy Johnson + Aimee Madison213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Aimee Madison
52W–54L career · 6 lines in 2023
1%90%8%
2.80
3
Lindsey Bye
29W–23L career · 3 lines in 2023
13%86%1%
2.65
Stacy Johnson
16W–21L career · no lines in 2023
24%75%<1%
2.60
3
Lauren Kauffman
40W–38L career · type A · 3 lines in 2023
56%44%<1%
2.48
Karen Leach
15W–5L career · no lines in 2023
0%92%8%
2.31

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.