Teams

SS-LT NAVY

2023 USTA ADULT 18 & OVER - DEN · WOMEN 2.5 - 18 & OVER

9 players · average NTRP 2.57 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2023-05-24vs HW GOLDLost 12
L#1 DoublesJudy Weisiger / Theresa Schuster vs Jill Ellsworth / Blythe Leinwand3-6, 5-7
L#1 SinglesSuzanne Paul vs Robin Earley2-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesAura Leigh Ferguson / Nicki Erdle vs Kathryn Briggs / Carina Clancy7-6, 6-3
2023-05-17vs CCV GREENLost 12
L#1 DoublesAmy Brink / Suzanne Paul vs Lauren Behm / Manuela Seewald2-6, 7-5, 0-1
L#1 SinglesJean Finegan vs Rebecca Aronoff0-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesTheresa Schuster / Aura Leigh Ferguson vs Lindsay Wingate / Nicky Fleming6-1, 6-2
2023-05-16vs SV REDLost 03
L#1 DoublesLaurie Heath / Theresa Schuster vs Lorri Basile / Whitney Coakley2-6, 6-7
L#1 SinglesAmy Brink vs Betsy Tapp3-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesJean Finegan / Judy Weisiger vs Cynthia Boyce / Laurie Lehmann1-6, 4-6
2023-05-03vs HV REDLost 12
L#1 DoublesNicki Erdle / Laurie Heath vs Leslie Clay / Alexandra Beltz6-3, 2-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesSarah Wells vs Hannah Quintana2-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesAura Leigh Ferguson / Suzanne Paul vs Erin Dawson / Alexis Theis6-4, 6-3
2023-04-26vs VCC REDSplit 11
L#1 DoublesAmy Brink / Laurie Heath vs Kristen Maley / Karen Leach6-3, 1-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesNicki Erdle / Sarah Wells vs Kelli Fisher / Aimee Madison6-0, 6-2
2023-04-19vs HW GOLDSplit 11
W#1 DoublesNicki Erdle / Aura Leigh Ferguson vs Jill Ellsworth / Jennifer Kuptz6-3, 6-2
L#2 DoublesAmy Brink / Sarah Wells vs Robin Earley / Haley Evans3-6, 5-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 2.5 - 18 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.32 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.79
Nicki Erdle
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.77
Sarah Wells
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
2.26
Suzanne Paul
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.25
Theresa Schuster
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
Aura Leigh Ferguson
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 2.5
2.23
Judy Weisiger
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 2.5
2.14
Laurie Heath
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
2.13
Amy Brink
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 2.5
2.00
Jean Finegan
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published 2.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Aura Leigh Ferguson + Theresa Schuster5068% games+14.8% vs expected
Judy Weisiger + Nicki Erdle12264% games+9.7% vs expected
Laurie Heath + Theresa Schuster9357% games+6.9% vs expected
Laurie Heath + Aura Leigh Ferguson5258% games+6.4% vs expected
Theresa Schuster + Nicki Erdle6357% games+6.1% vs expected
Suzanne Paul + Amy Brink9952% games+5.9% vs expected
Laurie Heath + Judy Weisiger8752% games+5.3% vs expected
Nicki Erdle + Amy Brink4257% games+4.2% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Nicki Erdle
89W–60L career · 4 lines in 2023
1%93%6%
2.79
Sarah Wells
42W–28L career · 3 lines in 2023
0%2%98%
2.77
Suzanne Paul
37W–47L career · 3 lines in 2023
0%97%3%
2.26
2.5
Theresa Schuster
57W–45L career · 3 lines in 2023
0%97%3%
2.25
2.5
Aura Leigh Ferguson
42W–67L career · 4 lines in 2023
not enough data
2.5
Judy Weisiger
58W–63L career · 2 lines in 2023
0%98%2%
2.23
2.5
Laurie Heath
72W–60L career · 3 lines in 2023
0%>99%<1%
2.14
2.5
Amy Brink
50W–54L career · 4 lines in 2023
0%>99%<1%
2.13
2.5
Jean Finegan
35W–36L career · 2 lines in 2023
0%>99%<1%
2.00

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.