Teams

HV RED

2023 USTA ADULT 18 & OVER - DEN · WOMEN 2.5 - 18 & OVER

12 players · average NTRP 2.72 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2023-05-31vs CCV GREENSplit 11
L#1 DoublesAshley DeGrush / Erin Pimm vs Lindsay Wingate / Melissa Mitarotonda0-6, 0-6
W#1 SinglesLeslie Clay vs Nicky Fleming6-1, 6-1
2023-05-24vs SV REDLost 03
L#1 DoublesStacie Moncrief / Aaren Wiesler vs Laurie Lehmann / Betsy Tapp6-4, 2-6, 0-1
L#1 SinglesAlison Goltermann vs Whitney Coakley4-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesCynthia Patton / Alexis Theis vs Cynthia Boyce / Lorri Basile1-6, 2-6
2023-05-22vs VCC REDLost 12
W#1 DoublesLeslie Clay / Hannah Quintana vs Lauren Kauffman / Aimee Madison6-3, 6-2
L#1 SinglesStacie Moncrief vs Stacy Johnson4-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesCynthia Patton / Aaren Wiesler vs Lindsey Bye / Kelli Fisher2-6, 1-6
2023-05-17vs HW GOLDLost 03
L#1 DoublesLeslie Clay / Aaren Wiesler vs Evyan Maniatis / Haley Evans5-7, 3-6
L#1 SinglesAlison Goltermann vs Kathryn Briggs4-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesAshley DeGrush / Erin Dawson vs Carina Clancy / Julie King2-6, 1-6
2023-05-04vs SV REDLost 03
L#1 DoublesHannah Quintana / Alexandra Beltz vs Laurie Lehmann / Cheryl Hammel6-7, 1-6
L#1 SinglesStacie Moncrief vs Betsy Tapp3-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesAshley DeGrush / Aaren Wiesler vs Jill Nabena / Whitney Coakley0-6, 0-6
2023-05-03vs SS-LT NAVYWon 21
W#1 DoublesLeslie Clay / Alexandra Beltz vs Nicki Erdle / Laurie Heath6-3, 2-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesHannah Quintana vs Sarah Wells6-2, 6-3
L#2 DoublesErin Dawson / Alexis Theis vs Aura Leigh Ferguson / Suzanne Paul4-6, 3-6
2023-04-26vs CCV GREENLost 02
L#1 SinglesLeslie Clay vs Lauren Behm2-6, 6-7
L#2 DoublesCarla Marugan / Cynthia Patton vs Nicky Fleming / Lindsay Wingate0-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings18 teams · WOMEN 2.5 - 18 & OVER
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1MEA RED703149174
2SS-H GREY7031413192
3APR-U RED7029622223
4LTA-Q BRONZE7027824242
5CCC BLUE70251029258
6CR-DC BLUE61241127259
7WP-G NAVY61241128258
8DTC GREEN61221330267
9NJ GREY52231225248
10KC-CC GREEN52231227261
11BTA-CU RED52221330250
12CM RED34191640303
13HRCA-N BLUE25152044350
14PRC BLUE25132246325
15KC-RH TEAL25112453370
16EM ORANGE15131738289
17CVTA ORANGE1672856361
18HV RED07112452359

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.40 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.88
Aaren Wiesler
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.83
Leslie Clay
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #1 Singles 40% · published
2.65
Alexandra Beltz
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.64
Alison Goltermann
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3
2.56
Hannah Quintana
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 3
2.28
Erin Dawson
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
Ashley DeGrush
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
2.14
Erin Pimm
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
2.07
Stacie Moncrief
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.05
Cynthia Patton
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
1.86
Carla Marugan
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
Alexis Theis
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Cynthia Patton + Erin Dawson6261% games+15.3% vs expected
Alison Goltermann + Aaren Wiesler5164% games+14.7% vs expected
Leslie Clay + Alison Goltermann4350% games+8.4% vs expected
Stacie Moncrief + Aaren Wiesler3354% games+8.0% vs expected
Leslie Clay + Aaren Wiesler4451% games+0.7% vs expected
Alexandra Beltz + Hannah Quintana4348% games−5.3% vs expected
Ashley DeGrush + Cynthia Patton0527% games−11.5% vs expected
Carla Marugan + Erin Dawson0531% games−12.3% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Aaren Wiesler
34W–19L career · 4 lines in 2023
<1%81%19%
2.88
Leslie Clay
47W–36L career · 5 lines in 2023
1%90%9%
2.83
3
Alexandra Beltz
14W–20L career · type A · 2 lines in 2023
12%88%<1%
2.65
3
Alison Goltermann
27W–18L career · 2 lines in 2023
14%85%<1%
2.64
3
Hannah Quintana
15W–11L career · 3 lines in 2023
33%67%<1%
2.56
2.5
Erin Dawson
12W–22L career · 2 lines in 2023
0%96%4%
2.28
2.5
Ashley DeGrush
1W–11L career · 3 lines in 2023
not enough data
2.5
Erin Pimm
8W–20L career · 1 line in 2023
0%>99%<1%
2.14
Stacie Moncrief
25W–41L career · 3 lines in 2023
0%>99%<1%
2.07
2.5
Cynthia Patton
14W–24L career · 3 lines in 2023
0%>99%<1%
2.05
2.5
Carla Marugan
3W–23L career · 1 line in 2023
0%>99%<1%
1.86
Alexis Theis
0W–2L career · 2 lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.