Teams

ATC NAVY

2022 USTA ADULT 40 & OVER - DEN · MEN 4.0 - 40 & OVER

9 players · average NTRP 3.33 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2022-07-18vs EM REDLost 12
L#1 DoublesDavid VonGunten / Russell Welty vs Mark Lindstrom / Kent Redding1-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesRichard Heppe / Mark Soane vs Daniel Moe / Gregory Fritsch4-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesNick Josephs / James Sigman vs Seth Turner / Martin Gaeth6-3, 6-2
2022-07-11vs WP REDLost 12
L#1 DoublesDavid VonGunten / Ted Pomeroy vs Ali Barghelame / Michael Nobles2-6, 2-6
W#1 SinglesZachary Davis vs Jonathan Bach6-1, 6-1
L#2 DoublesRichard Heppe / Mark Davis vs BRIAN ROSENTHAL / Daniel Chin0-6, 7-6, 0-1
2022-07-05vs SKY BLUELost 04
L#1 DoublesDavid VonGunten / Russell Welty vs Bob Sullivan / Doug Wiley3-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesZachary Davis vs Gregory Tamkin7-5, 2-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesMark Davis / Richard Heppe vs Kendrick McLish / Greg Rogers3-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesNick Josephs / Mark Soane vs Brett Abernathy / Conn Flanigan4-6, 3-6
2022-06-27vs GAC BLUELost 13
L#1 DoublesRichard Heppe / Ted Pomeroy vs David Longcope / Michael Runda3-6, 2-6
W#1 SinglesZachary Davis vs Richard Clymo7-6, 6-1
L#2 DoublesRussell Welty / David VonGunten vs Thomas Forti / Richard Smith1-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesJames Sigman / John Fairbairn vs Patrick Reed / Martin Rankin1-6, 4-6
2022-06-20vs CACM BLUESplit 22
L#1 DoublesDavid VonGunten / Russell Welty vs Philip Talley / Bryan Humphrys5-7, 4-6
W#1 SinglesZachary Davis vs Chris Cochrane4-6, 6-0, 1-0
L#2 DoublesNick Josephs / Richard Heppe vs Eric Mayer / John Darden3-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#3 DoublesMark Davis / Mark Soane vs Rick Lannon / Tab McGinley6-1, 6-1
2022-06-13vs DTP REDWon 40
W#1 DoublesTed Pomeroy / Richard Heppe vs David Richter / Morris Askenazi6-1, 6-2
W#1 SinglesZachary Davis vs David Richards6-0, 6-2
W#2 DoublesDavid VonGunten / Russell Welty vs David Russell / Jason Wang6-2, 6-1
W#3 DoublesJames Sigman / Nick Josephs vs Tim Gerlach / Brent Eklund6-1, 7-6
2022-06-06vs HW GREENLost 13
L#1 DoublesDavid VonGunten / John Fairbairn vs Andy Silverman / Richard Miranda1-6, 1-6
W#1 SinglesRichard Heppe vs N/A6-0, 6-0
L#2 DoublesMark Davis / Mark Soane vs Kelly Bolin / Tim Nicknish0-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesJames Sigman / Nick Josephs vs Lane Cutter / Mark Dwyer3-6, 7-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings5 teams · MEN 4.0 - 40 & OVER
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1CPV NAVY34111737259
2GLDN GOLD25121636247
3PH SILVER25131536257
4ATC NAVY25101837255
5RMTC GOLD25101840268

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.42 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.74
Zachary Davis
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
3.69
Ted Pomeroy
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.48
Mark Soane
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.48
Russell Welty
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
3.29
Richard Heppe
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published 3.5
3.14
James Sigman
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.12
Nick Josephs
usually #3 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
David VonGunten
usually #1 Doubles 71%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 3
John Fairbairn
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Russell Welty + Mark Soane4247% games−0.6% vs expected
Ted Pomeroy + Mark Soane2336% games−5.1% vs expected
Russell Welty + David VonGunten1932% games−8.6% vs expected
James Sigman + Nick Josephs51537% games−11.1% vs expected
Ted Pomeroy + Russell Welty314 matchesnot enough data
David VonGunten + John Fairbairn044 matchesnot enough data
Richard Heppe + David VonGunten123 matchesnot enough data
John Fairbairn + Mark Soane033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Zachary Davis
21W–27L career · 5 lines in 2022
3%95%2%
3.74
Ted Pomeroy
9W–19L career · 3 lines in 2022
7%92%1%
3.69
Mark Soane
12W–31L career · 4 lines in 2022
55%45%<1%
3.48
Russell Welty
10W–23L career · 5 lines in 2022
56%44%<1%
3.48
3.5
Richard Heppe
27W–40L career · 7 lines in 2022
1%93%6%
3.29
3.5
James Sigman
13W–38L career · 4 lines in 2022
14%86%<1%
3.14
Nick Josephs
7W–22L career · 5 lines in 2022
18%81%<1%
3.12
3
David VonGunten
4W–36L career · 7 lines in 2022
not enough data
John Fairbairn
1W–13L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.