Teams

GLDN GOLD

2022 USTA ADULT 40 & OVER - DEN · MEN 4.0 - 40 & OVER

10 players · average NTRP 3.88 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2022-07-18vs NJ REDLost 04
L#1 DoublesTroy Lowrie / Brant Lahnert vs Hank Fisher / Christopher Johnstone1-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesDevin Johnson vs Matt Farling3-6, 7-5, 1-0
L#2 DoublesWayne Williamson / David Bailey vs Bryan Pivovar / Eric Huelson2-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesVictor Nehf / Brian Macke vs Per Westholm / Bradley Jessen3-6, 3-6
2022-07-11vs MC REDLost 04
L#1 DoublesDevin Johnson / Brant Lahnert vs John Henry / John Wadden4-6, 4-6
L#1 SinglesWilliam Blattner vs John Clements2-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesTroy Lowrie / Brian Macke vs David Clark / Humberto Preciado3-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesEdward Pulido / Wayne Williamson vs Kumar Merchant / Mitchell Morrissey3-6, 6-7
2022-07-04vs LTC BLUEWon 31
W#1 DoublesTroy Lowrie / Brant Lahnert vs Mike Bennett / Andy MacQueen4-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#1 SinglesWilliam Blattner vs DANIEL KRATZER5-7, 6-4, 0-1
W#2 DoublesKishore Kulkarni / Wayne Williamson vs John Hughes / Greg Aigner6-1, 6-1
W#3 DoublesJesse Herrera / Victor Nehf vs Anthony Boone / Marvin Setzke5-7, 6-3, 1-0
2022-06-27vs RHCC BLUELost 13
L#1 DoublesWayne Williamson / David Bailey vs Matthew Joens / Steve Fisher3-6, 4-6
W#1 SinglesDevin Johnson vs Ryan Wither6-0, 6-3
L#2 DoublesVictor Nehf / Brian Macke vs Daniel Rabbitt / Richard Farquhar6-3, 6-7, 0-1
L#3 DoublesKishore Kulkarni / Jesse Herrera vs James McKinney / Jon McVey2-6, 0-6
2022-06-20vs NJ GOLDSplit 22
L#1 DoublesTroy Lowrie / David Bailey vs Dave Kranzler / Greg Leaver3-6, 4-6
W#1 SinglesWilliam Blattner vs Ron Funderburke6-2, 6-3
W#2 DoublesBrian Macke / Victor Nehf vs Joshua Larson / Garrett Sailer2-6, 7-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesKishore Kulkarni / Edward Pulido vs Tony Cromwell / Richard Allen4-6, 6-4, 0-1
2022-06-13Won 10
W#2 DoublesVictor Nehf / Edward Pulido vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2022-06-06vs BP GREENSplit 22
W#1 DoublesBrant Lahnert / Troy Lowrie vs Matt Whitmer / Brian Dino6-4, 6-3
L#1 SinglesDevin Johnson vs Chris Evans2-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesDavid Bailey / Wayne Williamson vs Michael Richmond / Travis Staebell6-3, 4-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesWilliam Blattner / Jesse Herrera vs Jon Mason / Craig Tierney4-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings5 teams · MEN 4.0 - 40 & OVER
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1CPV NAVY34111737259
2GLDN GOLD25121636247
3PH SILVER25131536257
4ATC NAVY25101837255
5RMTC GOLD25101840268

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.78 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.08
Brant Lahnert
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.87
Victor Nehf
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.77
Troy Lowrie
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.67
William Blattner
usually #1 Singles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
3.51
Jesse Herrera
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Brian Macke
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
Devin Johnson
usually #1 Singles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
Edward Pulido
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Kishore Kulkarni
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Wayne Williamson
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kishore Kulkarni + Edward Pulido3355% games+1.7% vs expected
Victor Nehf + Wayne Williamson5353% games+0.2% vs expected
Jesse Herrera + William Blattner121949% games−3.0% vs expected
Jesse Herrera + Kishore Kulkarni2433% gamesnot enough data
Kishore Kulkarni + Brian Macke044 matchesnot enough data
Victor Nehf + Brian Macke123 matchesnot enough data
Victor Nehf + Brant Lahnert123 matchesnot enough data
William Blattner + Wayne Williamson123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Brant Lahnert
108W–45L career · 4 lines in 2022
<1%26%74%
4.08
4
Victor Nehf
59W–69L career · 5 lines in 2022
<1%83%17%
3.87
4
Troy Lowrie
65W–45L career · 5 lines in 2022
2%94%4%
3.77
William Blattner
21W–36L career · 4 lines in 2022
10%90%1%
3.67
Jesse Herrera
16W–32L career · 3 lines in 2022
46%54%<1%
3.51
3.5
Brian Macke
7W–21L career · 4 lines in 2022
not enough data
Devin Johnson
30W–25L career · 4 lines in 2022
not enough data
Edward Pulido
5W–6L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data
Kishore Kulkarni
21W–30L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data
Wayne Williamson
53W–38L career · 5 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.