Teams

PH SILVER

2022 USTA ADULT 40 & OVER - DEN · MEN 4.0 - 40 & OVER

12 players · average NTRP 4.00 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2022-07-18vs SSG BLUELost 13
L#1 DoublesNed Rollhaus / Tom Robinson vs Dan Shea / Rick Blankenship6-4, 5-7, 0-1
W#1 SinglesBob Brinker vs Mark Benson6-3, 4-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesRob Deevy / Bill McDonald vs Sunil Bheemireddy / Timothy Roberge2-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesPhil Kelly / Adam Starr vs Jerry Cerkovnik / Chris Gould7-6, 4-6, 1-0
2022-07-11vs LEBTC GREENLost 13
L#1 DoublesJay Calderone / Benjamin Franzen vs Rick Schreiber / Vincent Gonzales2-6, 6-7
W#1 SinglesTom Robinson vs Arin Neucks6-1, 6-2
L#2 DoublesRob Deevy / Bob Brinker vs Bill Trummer / Eric Taylor3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#3 DoublesAdam Starr / Phil Kelly vs Tucker Franciscus / Richard Selim6-4, 3-6, 0-1
2022-07-05vs KC GOLDSplit 22
L#1 DoublesJay Calderone / Steven Schrader vs Clay Adams / Tony Hill2-6, 5-7
W#1 SinglesBob Brinker vs Perry Christie6-2, 2-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesBenjamin Franzen / Richard Wright vs David Brenner / Dustin Collins2-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesRob Deevy / Adam Starr vs Emmett Crabbe / Samuel Faustino6-7, 6-1, 1-0
2022-06-27vs KC BLUEWon 30
W#1 DoublesTom Robinson / Bill McDonald vs Reuben Ybarra / Gary Smith6-2, 6-0
W#2 DoublesBenjamin Franzen / Richard Wright vs Josh Christensen / Damon Judd6-1, 6-7, 1-0
W#3 DoublesJay Calderone / Rob Deevy vs Louis Elster / Tom Schippert6-1, 4-6, 1-0
2022-06-20vs MC GREENWon 30
W#1 DoublesJay Calderone / Steven Schrader vs Rom van der Zee / Jerry Neff3-6, 6-0, 1-0
W#2 DoublesRichard Wright / Benjamin Franzen vs Reza Esfahani / Jonathan Stein6-4, 6-4
W#3 DoublesPhil Kelly / Bob Brinker vs Jac Barben / David Sungelo6-4, 6-1
2022-06-13vs SSG BLUELost 12
L#1 DoublesSteven Schrader / Benjamin Franzen vs Henk Wessels / Dan Shea2-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesJay Calderone / Richard Wright vs Sunil Bheemireddy / Rick Blankenship3-6, 7-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesTom Robinson / Phil Kelly vs Timothy Roberge / Harry Dorcy6-3, 7-5
2022-06-06vs LEBTC GREENLost 13
L#1 DoublesNed Rollhaus / Steven Schrader vs Kevin Mahoney / Vincent Gonzales4-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesBob Brinker vs Arin Neucks6-3, 3-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesJay Calderone / Bill McDonald vs Richard Selim / Alexander Page4-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesAdam Starr / Jim Pinto vs Edward Partlow / Brandon Dumler6-3, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings5 teams · MEN 4.0 - 40 & OVER
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1CPV NAVY34111737259
2GLDN GOLD25121636247
3PH SILVER25131536257
4ATC NAVY25101837255
5RMTC GOLD25101840268

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.60 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.88
Tom Robinson
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 25% · published
3.76
Rob Deevy
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Adam Starr
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
Benjamin Franzen
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 4
Bill McDonald
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
Bob Brinker
usually #1 Singles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.69
Jay Calderone
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.63
Ned Rollhaus
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.62
Steven Schrader
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.02
Phil Kelly
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Jim Pinto
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Miles Edwards
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Steven Schrader + Bill McDonald4250% games−2.1% vs expected
Steven Schrader + Jay Calderone4547% games−2.8% vs expected
Rob Deevy + Jay Calderone4354% games−3.2% vs expected
Jim Pinto + Adam Starr3255% gamesnot enough data
Ned Rollhaus + Tom Robinson314 matchesnot enough data
Steven Schrader + Rob Deevy224 matchesnot enough data
Phil Kelly + Adam Starr033 matchesnot enough data
Ned Rollhaus + Steven Schrader033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Tom Robinson
74W–24L career · 4 lines in 2022
<1%82%17%
3.88
Rob Deevy
38W–33L career · 4 lines in 2022
2%95%3%
3.76
4
Adam Starr
9W–10L career · 4 lines in 2022
not enough data
4
Benjamin Franzen
17W–21L career · 5 lines in 2022
not enough data
4
Bill McDonald
10W–19L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data
4
Bob Brinker
17W–19L career · type M · 5 lines in 2022
not enough data
4
Jay Calderone
42W–59L career · 6 lines in 2022
7%92%1%
3.69
Ned Rollhaus
34W–33L career · 2 lines in 2022
16%84%<1%
3.63
Steven Schrader
18W–31L career · 4 lines in 2022
17%82%<1%
3.62
Phil Kelly
15W–20L career · 4 lines in 2022
43%57%<1%
3.02
Jim Pinto
8W–6L career · 1 line in 2022
not enough data
Miles Edwards
0W–3L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.