Teams

LTA BLUE

2023 USTA ADULT 55 & OVER - NOCO · MEN 8.0 - 55 & OVER - NOCO

7 players · average NTRP 3.67 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2023-06-16vs HMTC SILVERLost 02
L#1 DoublesEd Kellogg / Richard Kilgore vs Mark Sundstedt / Kent Mueller6-3, 2-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesRichard Stitt / Richard Kostecki vs Keith Montey / Don Walker5-7, 0-6
2023-05-26vs HMTC PURPLEWon 10
W#3 DoublesEd Kellogg / Richard Kilgore vs Matt Badger / Richard Penhale4-6, 6-3, 1-0
2023-05-19vs CSU GREENWon 10
W#2 DoublesMark Ackermann / Richard Kilgore vs Scott Kunze / Aaron Carta7-5, 6-3
2023-05-12vs HMTC SILVERSplit 11
L#1 DoublesJere Barto / Richard Kilgore vs Keith Montey / Don Walker3-4
W#3 DoublesEd Kellogg / Richard Stitt vs Dennis Knopf / Dwight Muhlbradt7-5, 6-2
2023-05-05vs FCCC REDWon 10
W#3 DoublesRichard Stitt / Richard Kilgore vs Robin Wick / Daniel Holmes6-3, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for MEN 8.0 - 55 & OVER - NOCO have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.62 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.67
Leonard Martinez
published
3.67
Richard Stitt
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.63
Richard Kilgore
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.60
Scott Hemphill
published
3.51
Ed Kellogg
published 3.5
Jere Barto
published
Timothy Morneau
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Richard Stitt + Richard Kilgore11552% games−4.3% vs expected
Jere Barto + Timothy Morneau314 matchesnot enough data
Scott Hemphill + Timothy Morneau224 matchesnot enough data
Scott Hemphill + Richard Kilgore134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Leonard Martinez
20W–12L career · no lines in 2023
<1%11%89%
3.67
3.5
Richard Stitt
43W–25L career · type A · 3 lines in 2023
<1%11%89%
3.67
4
Richard Kilgore
117W–66L career · 5 lines in 2023
19%81%<1%
3.63
Scott Hemphill
9W–22L career · no lines in 2023
23%76%<1%
3.60
3.5
Ed Kellogg
40W–11L career · no lines in 2023
<1%48%52%
3.51
Jere Barto
5W–3L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Timothy Morneau
7W–4L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.