Teams

FCCC RED

2023 USTA ADULT 55 & OVER - NOCO · MEN 8.0 - 55 & OVER - NOCO

9 players · average NTRP 3.80 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2023-06-18vs HMTC PURPLESplit 11
L#1 DoublesPeter Corran / Matthew Hoeven vs Bret Holcomb / Michael Jamieson7-6, 3-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesChristian Bachelet / John Verwys vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2023-06-09vs LTA BLUELost 02
L#1 DoublesRobin Wick / Matthew Hoeven vs Scott Hemphill / Timothy Morneau3-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesChristian Bachelet / John Verwys vs Ed Kellogg / Jon Messick0-6, 4-6
2023-06-02vs CSU GREENWon 10
W#3 DoublesMark Koepke / Matthew Hoeven vs Aaron Carta / Jeff Brauch6-2, 6-2
2023-05-26vs HMTC SILVERSplit 11
L#2 DoublesChristian Bachelet / Brian Dunbar vs Kim Bender / Dwight Muhlbradt3-6, 7-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesPeter Corran / Gregory Gibbs vs Keith Montey / Dennis Knopf6-2, 6-1
2023-05-19vs HMTC PURPLELost 02
L#1 DoublesPeter Corran / Mark Koepke vs Chris Moore / Michael Jamieson0-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesChristian Bachelet / Brian Dunbar vs Richard Penhale / Gordon Motley5-7, 6-1, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for MEN 8.0 - 55 & OVER - NOCO have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.71 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.13
Tom Weller
published
4.01
Gregory Gibbs
published
3.91
Christian Bachelet
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.64
Matthew Hoeven
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.62
Robin Wick
published
3.58
Peter Corran
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.44
Daniel Holmes
published 3.5
3.34
Brian Dunbar
published 3.5
Mark Koepke
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Tom Weller + Brian Dunbar3251% gamesnot enough data
Matthew Hoeven + Peter Corran123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Tom Weller
12W–16L career · no lines in 2023
18%81%<1%
4.13
Gregory Gibbs
44W–20L career · no lines in 2023
<1%47%53%
4.01
4
Christian Bachelet
47W–64L career · 4 lines in 2023
<1%73%27%
3.91
4
Matthew Hoeven
30W–57L career · 3 lines in 2023
15%84%1%
3.64
Robin Wick
8W–10L career · no lines in 2023
21%79%<1%
3.62
4
Peter Corran
33W–51L career · 3 lines in 2023
30%70%<1%
3.58
3.5
Daniel Holmes
28W–11L career · no lines in 2023
<1%68%32%
3.44
3.5
Brian Dunbar
14W–7L career · no lines in 2023
1%87%12%
3.34
Mark Koepke
2W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.