Teams

CSU GREEN

2023 USTA ADULT 55 & OVER - NOCO · MEN 8.0 - 55 & OVER - NOCO

7 players · average NTRP 3.67 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2023-06-16vs HMTC PURPLELost 01
L#1 DoublesJared Habein / Rick Wehmeyer vs Chris Moore / Matt Badger1-6, 1-6
2023-06-09vs HMTC SILVERLost 01
L#1 DoublesRick Wehmeyer / Jeff Brauch vs Kim Devoe / Steven Tucker4-6, 7-5, 0-1
2023-06-02vs FCCC REDLost 03
L#1 DoublesRick Wehmeyer / Scott Kunze vs Robin Wick / Gregory Gibbs4-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesJared Habein / Jon Leydens vs Tom Weller / Brian Dunbar3-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesAaron Carta / Jeff Brauch vs Mark Koepke / Matthew Hoeven2-6, 2-6
2023-06-01vs HMTC PURPLELost 03
L#1 DoublesRobert Rubin / Jared Habein vs Bret Holcomb / Kendal Sanders4-6, 6-7
L#2 DoublesScott Kunze / Rick Wehmeyer vs Richard Penhale / Matt Badger6-7, 6-3, 0-1
L#3 DoublesAaron Carta / Jeff Brauch vs Terry Fine / Gordon Motley0-2
2023-05-19vs LTA BLUELost 02
L#1 DoublesJared Habein / Jon Leydens vs Matthew Martinez / Leonard Martinez0-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesScott Kunze / Aaron Carta vs Mark Ackermann / Richard Kilgore5-7, 3-6
2023-05-05vs HMTC SILVERWon 10
W#2 DoublesJared Habein / Aaron Carta vs Keith Montey / Don Walker6-3, 2-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for MEN 8.0 - 55 & OVER - NOCO have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.36 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.49
Rick Wehmeyer
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.43
Jared Habein
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.17
Aaron Carta
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
Ernest Chavez
published
Jeff Brauch
published
Scott Kunze
published
Walter Steige
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Rick Wehmeyer + Jared Habein033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Rick Wehmeyer
24W–32L career · 4 lines in 2023
54%46%<1%
3.49
3.5
Jared Habein
48W–66L career · 5 lines in 2023
<1%68%32%
3.43
3.5
Aaron Carta
48W–35L career · 4 lines in 2023
12%88%1%
3.17
Ernest Chavez
9W–9L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Jeff Brauch
5W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Scott Kunze
1W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Walter Steige
1W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.