Teams

Smith, Mindy

2026 HOA Adult 55 & Over 6.0 - 9.0 · 6.0 Combo - Women - 55

12 players · average NTRP 3.00 / HEART OF AMERICA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2026-06-21vs Elving, BeverlyLost 03
L#1 DoublesDiane Phillips / Vicky Knudson vs Carolyn Frazier / Beth Wood1-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesJUDY STAROSCIK / Julie Fuller vs Beverly Elving / Marcella Prock3-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesTeresa Riggins / Kay Harper vs Jannelle McGee / Jenell Puett3-6, 3-6
2026-06-07vs Hodge, KathyLost 12
L#1 DoublesVicky Knudson / Imelda Tooey vs Paulette Schwerdt / Elizabeth MacGonagle3-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesDiane Phillips / Julie Fuller vs Kathy Perkins / Andrea Kipp6-3, 5-7, 1-0
L#3 DoublesKay Harper / Cathy Czir vs Kathy Hodge / Nancy Cayton Myers2-6, 3-6
2026-05-31vs HOA/Mckeone/55&over6.0WLost 03
L#1 DoublesSusan Winn / Lora Mccurdy vs Vicki McKeone / Kim Povirk6-0, 2-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesMindy Smith / Julie Fuller vs Jody McClain / Ann Cronkhite3-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesJoAnn Ward / Teresa Riggins vs Juli McGuire / Kenda Caskey1-6, 6-7
2026-05-17vs Robertson, MarciaLost 12
L#1 DoublesDiane Phillips / Imelda Tooey vs Diane Freeman / Maryanne Loscalzo3-6, 7-5, 0-1
L#2 DoublesMindy Smith / Susan Winn vs Connie Johnson / Donna Turnbull6-1, 0-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesCathy Czir / JUDY STAROSCIK vs Roberta Dierks / Kathy Loepp7-6, 3-5, 1-0
2026-05-09vs Elving, BeverlyLost 12
W#1 DoublesDiane Phillips / Imelda Tooey vs Beth Wood / Krissi Wagner7-6, 2-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesLora Mccurdy / Julie Fuller vs Marcella Prock / Suzie Honeyman2-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesTeresa Riggins / JoAnn Ward vs Mary Krizman / Shelly Mowery4-6, 1-6
2026-04-19vs Hodge, KathyLost 03
L#1 DoublesSibley Frye / Mindy Smith vs Nancy Brady / Elizabeth MacGonagle2-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesDiane Phillips / JUDY STAROSCIK vs Kathy Perkins / Kathy Hodge6-3, 2-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesCathy Czir / JoAnn Ward vs Paulette Schwerdt / Elizabeth Day0-6, 2-6
2026-04-12vs HOA/Mckeone/55&over6.0WLost 12
L#1 DoublesImelda Tooey / Susan Winn vs Beth Strader / Christie Montague1-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesJulie Fuller / Diane Phillips vs Kim Pulford / Cindy Kochersperger7-6, 6-3
L#3 DoublesKay Harper / JUDY STAROSCIK vs Ann Cronkhite / Jody McClain3-6, 0-6
2026-04-04vs Robertson, MarciaWon 21
W#1 DoublesSusan Winn / Mindy Smith vs Diane Freeman / Marcia Robertson5-7, 6-3, 1-0
W#2 DoublesSibley Frye / Vicky Knudson vs Connie Johnson / Maryanne Loscalzo6-3, 6-7, 1-0
L#3 DoublesLora Mccurdy / Kay Harper vs Roberta Dierks / Donna Turnbull6-7, 3-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings3 teams · 6.0 Combo - Women - 55
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1HOA/Mckeone/55&over6.0W6215920205
2Robertson, Marcia62141025213
3Smith, Mindy1761841266

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.61 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.82
Diane Phillips
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.81
Imelda Tooey
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 38% · published
2.69
Lora Mccurdy
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
2.59
Teresa Riggins
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.54
Kay Harper
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.50
Cathy Czir
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.48
JUDY STAROSCIK
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.44
Julie Fuller
usually #2 Doubles 86%, also #1 Doubles 14% · published
Mindy Smith
published
Sibley Frye
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Susan Winn
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Vicky Knudson
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Julie Fuller + Diane Phillips314 matchesnot enough data
Susan Winn + Imelda Tooey044 matchesnot enough data
Julie Fuller + Lora Mccurdy123 matchesnot enough data
Sibley Frye + Mindy Smith213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Diane Phillips
31W–26L career · 6 lines in 2026
1%89%10%
2.82
Imelda Tooey
19W–60L career · 8 lines in 2026
1%90%9%
2.81
Lora Mccurdy
1W–5L career · 3 lines in 2026
9%90%1%
2.69
Teresa Riggins
2W–12L career · 3 lines in 2026
26%74%<1%
2.59
Kay Harper
20W–34L career · 4 lines in 2026
40%60%<1%
2.54
3
Cathy Czir
29W–54L career · 3 lines in 2026
49%51%<1%
2.50
JUDY STAROSCIK
25W–44L career · 4 lines in 2026
56%44%<1%
2.48
Julie Fuller
26W–83L career · 7 lines in 2026
66%34%<1%
2.44
Mindy Smith
9W–9L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Sibley Frye
26W–12L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Susan Winn
8W–46L career · 4 lines in 2026
not enough data
Vicky Knudson
21W–40L career · 3 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.