Teams

Elving, Beverly

2026 HOA Adult 55 & Over 6.0 - 9.0 · 6.0 Combo - Women - 55

14 players · average NTRP 2.88 / HEART OF AMERICA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2026-06-21vs Smith, MindyWon 30
W#1 DoublesCarolyn Frazier / Beth Wood vs Diane Phillips / Vicky Knudson6-1, 6-3
W#2 DoublesBeverly Elving / Marcella Prock vs JUDY STAROSCIK / Julie Fuller6-3, 6-3
W#3 DoublesJannelle McGee / Jenell Puett vs Teresa Riggins / Kay Harper6-3, 6-3
2026-06-14vs Hodge, KathyLost 03
L#1 DoublesCarolyn Frazier / Mary Krizman vs Nancy Brady / Deborah Friesen5-7, 0-0
L#2 DoublesKimberly Mason / Jannelle McGee vs Janet Peard / Kathy Perkins6-2, 5-7, 0-1
L#3 DoublesBeverly Elving / Shelly Mowery vs Kathy Hodge / Andrea Kipp5-7, 2-6
2026-06-07vs HOA/Mckeone/55&over6.0WLost 12
L#1 DoublesBeth Wood / Krissi Wagner vs Beth Strader / Shelly Olufson4-6, 7-5, 0-1
W#2 DoublesHeather Jorns / Marcella Prock vs Patricia Cowen / Kim Pulford6-4, 4-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesBeverly Elving / Kimberly Mason vs Vicki McKeone / Cindy Kochersperger3-6, 0-6
2026-05-31vs Robertson, MarciaLost 12
L#1 DoublesCarolyn Frazier / Beth Wood vs Carol Levalley / Marcia Robertson6-1, 4-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesMarcella Prock / Suzie Honeyman vs Roberta Dierks / Chris Westermajer5-7, 7-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesBeverly Elving / Jannelle McGee vs Irene Harkleroad / Maryanne Loscalzo6-4, 7-5
2026-05-09vs Smith, MindyWon 21
L#1 DoublesBeth Wood / Krissi Wagner vs Diane Phillips / Imelda Tooey6-7, 6-2, 0-1
W#2 DoublesMarcella Prock / Suzie Honeyman vs Lora Mccurdy / Julie Fuller6-2, 6-1
W#3 DoublesMary Krizman / Shelly Mowery vs Teresa Riggins / JoAnn Ward6-4, 6-1
2026-04-26vs Hodge, KathyLost 12
W#1 DoublesSuzie Honeyman / Krissi Wagner vs Elizabeth MacGonagle / Paulette Schwerdt6-1, 6-3
L#2 DoublesShelly Mowery / Kimberly Mason vs Kathy Perkins / Andrea Kipp4-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesPaulette Prieb / Jenell Puett vs Kathy Hodge / Elizabeth Day6-7, 2-5
2026-04-19vs HOA/Mckeone/55&over6.0WLost 12
W#1 DoublesCarolyn Frazier / Suzie Honeyman vs Vicki McKeone / Janet Crawford7-5, 6-1
L#2 DoublesShelly Mowery / Heather Jorns vs Cindy Kochersperger / Tiffany Wilkinson1-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesKimberly Mason / Jannelle McGee vs Lucretia Raby / Beth Strader6-7, 2-6
2026-04-12vs Robertson, MarciaLost 12
W#1 DoublesBeth Wood / Carolyn Frazier vs Diane Freeman / Kathy Loepp6-1, 6-2
L#2 DoublesMary Krizman / Paulette Prieb vs Brenda Kirwin / Carol Levalley3-6, 3-5
L#3 DoublesJannelle McGee / Jenell Puett vs Connie Johnson / Donna Turnbull3-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 6.0 Combo - Women - 55 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.74 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.94
Suzie Honeyman
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.90
Beth Wood
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.89
Carolyn Frazier
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.84
Krissi Wagner
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
2.79
Mary Krizman
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
2.79
Marcella Prock
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.79
Shelly Mowery
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
2.78
Jannelle McGee
usually #3 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
2.64
Cynthia Pfeiffer
published 3
2.58
Heather Jorns
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.50
Beverly Elving
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 2.5
2.44
Paulette Prieb
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Jenell Puett
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Kimberly Mason
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Shelly Mowery + Krissi Wagner6946% games−2.8% vs expected
Suzie Honeyman + Beth Wood2547% gamesnot enough data
Jannelle McGee + Kimberly Mason1448% gamesnot enough data
Beth Wood + Carolyn Frazier213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Suzie Honeyman
31W–21L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%66%34%
2.94
3
Beth Wood
31W–36L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%77%23%
2.90
3
Carolyn Frazier
10W–4L career · type S · 5 lines in 2026
<1%79%21%
2.89
Krissi Wagner
72W–79L career · 6 lines in 2026
1%87%12%
2.84
Mary Krizman
22W–22L career · 3 lines in 2026
2%91%7%
2.79
Marcella Prock
46W–32L career · 4 lines in 2026
2%91%7%
2.79
Shelly Mowery
28W–35L career · 4 lines in 2026
2%91%7%
2.79
Jannelle McGee
29W–26L career · 5 lines in 2026
2%92%6%
2.78
3
Cynthia Pfeiffer
22W–43L career · no lines in 2026
15%84%1%
2.64
Heather Jorns
6W–27L career · 2 lines in 2026
29%71%<1%
2.58
2.5
Beverly Elving
21W–44L career · 4 lines in 2026
0%51%49%
2.50
Paulette Prieb
8W–33L career · 2 lines in 2026
67%33%<1%
2.44
Jenell Puett
1W–2L career · 3 lines in 2026
not enough data
Kimberly Mason
2W–7L career · 4 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.