Teams

Hodge, Kathy

2026 HOA Adult 55 & Over 6.0 - 9.0 · 6.0 Combo - Women - 55

11 players · average NTRP 3.00 / HEART OF AMERICA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2026-06-21vs Robertson, MarciaLost 12
L#1 DoublesRebecca Dick / Paulette Schwerdt vs Monica Levens / Donna Turnbull2-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesAndrea Kipp / Kathy Perkins vs Roberta Dierks / Kathy Loepp2-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#3 DoublesKathy Hodge / Nancy Cayton Myers vs Brenda Kirwin / Carol Levalley4-6, 2-6
2026-06-14vs Elving, BeverlyWon 30
W#1 DoublesNancy Brady / Deborah Friesen vs Carolyn Frazier / Mary Krizman7-5, 0-0
W#2 DoublesJanet Peard / Kathy Perkins vs Kimberly Mason / Jannelle McGee2-6, 7-5, 1-0
W#3 DoublesKathy Hodge / Andrea Kipp vs Beverly Elving / Shelly Mowery7-5, 6-2
2026-06-07vs Smith, MindyWon 21
W#1 DoublesPaulette Schwerdt / Elizabeth MacGonagle vs Vicky Knudson / Imelda Tooey6-3, 6-3
L#2 DoublesKathy Perkins / Andrea Kipp vs Diane Phillips / Julie Fuller3-6, 7-5, 0-1
W#3 DoublesKathy Hodge / Nancy Cayton Myers vs Kay Harper / Cathy Czir6-2, 6-3
2026-05-17vs HOA/Mckeone/55&over6.0WLost 12
L#1 DoublesNancy Brady / Deborah Friesen vs Patricia Cowen / Christie Montague4-6, 5-7
L#2 DoublesPaulette Schwerdt / Elizabeth Day vs Vicki McKeone / Janet Crawford1-6, 6-7
W#3 DoublesKathy Hodge / Rebecca Dick vs Jody McClain / Ann Cronkhite6-4, 7-6
2026-05-09vs Robertson, MarciaLost 12
W#1 DoublesElizabeth MacGonagle / Andrea Kipp vs Diane Freeman / Maryanne Loscalzo6-0, 7-5
L#2 DoublesKathy Hodge / Janet Peard vs Connie Johnson / Chris Westermajer3-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesRebecca Dick / Nancy Cayton Myers vs Carol Levalley / Marcia Robertson3-6, 1-6
2026-04-26vs Elving, BeverlyWon 21
L#1 DoublesElizabeth MacGonagle / Paulette Schwerdt vs Suzie Honeyman / Krissi Wagner1-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesKathy Perkins / Andrea Kipp vs Shelly Mowery / Kimberly Mason6-4, 6-2
W#3 DoublesKathy Hodge / Elizabeth Day vs Paulette Prieb / Jenell Puett7-6, 5-2
2026-04-19vs Smith, MindyWon 30
W#1 DoublesNancy Brady / Elizabeth MacGonagle vs Sibley Frye / Mindy Smith6-2, 6-1
W#2 DoublesKathy Perkins / Kathy Hodge vs Diane Phillips / JUDY STAROSCIK6-3, 2-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesPaulette Schwerdt / Elizabeth Day vs Cathy Czir / JoAnn Ward6-0, 6-2
2026-04-04vs HOA/Mckeone/55&over6.0WWon 21
W#1 DoublesNancy Brady / Janet Peard vs Vicki McKeone / Kenda Caskey6-1, 6-3
W#2 DoublesKathy Hodge / Andrea Kipp vs Juli McGuire / Lucretia Raby6-4, 6-7, 1-0
L#3 DoublesElizabeth Day / Nancy Cayton Myers vs Cindy Kochersperger / Janet Crawford6-7, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 6.0 Combo - Women - 55 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.74 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.90
Nancy Brady
usually #1 Doubles 70%, also #3 Doubles 30% · published
2.80
Deborah Friesen
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.79
Andrea Kipp
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 17% · published 3
2.78
Rebecca Dick
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.77
Elizabeth MacGonagle
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.72
Kathy Hodge
usually #3 Doubles 63%, also #2 Doubles 38% · published
2.72
Janet Peard
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.71
Kathy Perkins
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.67
Paulette Schwerdt
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
2.49
Nancy Cayton Myers
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Elizabeth Day
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Andrea Kipp + Kathy Hodge6454% games+5.2% vs expected
Elizabeth MacGonagle + Kathy Perkins3549% games+2.2% vs expected
Nancy Cayton Myers + Kathy Hodge4647% games+0.2% vs expected
Paulette Schwerdt + Kathy Perkins2548% games−1.0% vs expected
Elizabeth MacGonagle + Paulette Schwerdt4446% games−1.3% vs expected
Kathy Perkins + Kathy Hodge3548% games−3.3% vs expected
Andrea Kipp + Kathy Perkins111449% games−3.7% vs expected
Elizabeth MacGonagle + Kathy Hodge3448% games−6.6% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Nancy Brady
53W–82L career · 10 lines in 2026
<1%76%24%
2.90
3
Deborah Friesen
34W–73L career · 2 lines in 2026
2%91%7%
2.80
3
Andrea Kipp
26W–24L career · 6 lines in 2026
2%91%7%
2.79
Rebecca Dick
14W–23L career · 3 lines in 2026
2%92%6%
2.78
Elizabeth MacGonagle
26W–58L career · 4 lines in 2026
3%92%5%
2.77
Kathy Hodge
39W–72L career · 8 lines in 2026
6%92%2%
2.72
Janet Peard
22W–41L career · 3 lines in 2026
6%92%2%
2.72
Kathy Perkins
33W–71L career · 5 lines in 2026
7%91%2%
2.71
Paulette Schwerdt
24W–35L career · 5 lines in 2026
11%88%1%
2.67
Nancy Cayton Myers
16W–45L career · 4 lines in 2026
54%46%<1%
2.49
Elizabeth Day
6W–9L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.