Teams

Double or Nothin

2025 USTA ADULT 65 & OVER-IDAHO FALLS · Women 7.0 - 65 & Over

10 players · average NTRP 3.00 / IDAHO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
L#1 DoublesLori Head / Venita Petti vs Teresa Henderson / Robbie Spicer1-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesMarie Parkinson / Ann Schenk vs Sue Hunter / Deborah Stosich2-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesBarbara Baker / Aimee Rathburn vs Jackie Fuller / Dee Hicks3-6, 1-6
L#1 DoublesVenita Petti / Ann Schenk vs Jinny Boozer / Robbie Spicer1-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesLori Head / Barbara Baker vs Dee Hicks / Kathy Lloyd1-6, 2-6
L#1 DoublesLibby Cameron / Vicki Krogstrand vs Eli Griffin / Deborah Stosich1-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesMarie Parkinson / Melanie Pratt vs Teresa Henderson / Robbie Spicer0-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesAimee Rathburn / Barbara Baker vs Jinny Boozer / Jackie Fuller1-6, 0-6
L#1 DoublesAnn Schenk / Melanie Pratt vs Sue Hunter / Bonnie Peterson0-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesBarbara Baker / Aimee Rathburn vs Susan Hulse / Deborah Stosich1-6, 0-6
L#1 DoublesBarbara Baker / Aimee Rathburn vs Kathy Lloyd / Bonnie Peterson2-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesVenita Petti / Ann Schenk vs Jackie Fuller / Eli Griffin3-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesMarie Parkinson / Melanie Pratt vs Teresa Henderson / Susan Hulse2-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · Women 7.0 - 65 & Over
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1TEAMWORK MAKES THE DREAM WORK AGAIN50150039
2Double or Nothin0501530180

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.63 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Ann Schenk
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #1 Doubles 43% · published 3
2.68
Aimee Rathburn
usually #1 Doubles 43%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 3
2.66
Venita Petti
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 43% · published 3
2.65
Marie Parkinson
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.65
Melanie Pratt
usually #1 Doubles 43%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published 3
2.63
Barbara Baker
usually #3 Doubles 56%, also #1 Doubles 22% · published 3
2.57
Lori Head
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 3
2.56
Irene Rindfleisch
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
Libby Cameron
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
Vicki Krogstrand
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Marie Parkinson + Barbara Baker9457% games−0.8% vs expected
Marie Parkinson + Irene Rindfleisch3544% games−2.6% vs expected
Aimee Rathburn + Barbara Baker2639% games−3.1% vs expected
Irene Rindfleisch + Barbara Baker6846% games−15.6% vs expected
Marie Parkinson + Melanie Pratt1440% gamesnot enough data
Aimee Rathburn + Libby Cameron2348% gamesnot enough data
Marie Parkinson + Vicki Krogstrand224 matchesnot enough data
Lori Head + Barbara Baker134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Ann Schenk
16W–32L career · 7 lines in 2025
not enough data
3
Aimee Rathburn
58W–102L career · 7 lines in 2025
10%89%1%
2.68
3
Venita Petti
81W–116L career · 7 lines in 2025
12%87%1%
2.66
3
Marie Parkinson
61W–79L career · 6 lines in 2025
14%86%1%
2.65
3
Melanie Pratt
6W–11L career · 7 lines in 2025
15%85%1%
2.65
3
Barbara Baker
65W–102L career · 9 lines in 2025
18%81%<1%
2.63
3
Lori Head
51W–95L career · 5 lines in 2025
30%70%<1%
2.57
3
Irene Rindfleisch
32W–47L career · 1 line in 2025
34%65%<1%
2.56
Libby Cameron
25W–44L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
Vicki Krogstrand
37W–32L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.