Teams

MEMPK MCCARRON

2021 CTA TWILIGHT - SOCO · WOMEN 4.0 - TWILIGHT - SOCO

8 players · average NTRP 3.75 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2021-08-23vs LFTCS MOOREWon 10
W#2 DoublesNancy Barker / Amanda Irons vs Anne Ryals / Tatiana Merkoulova6-2, 6-4
2021-08-16vs PBTC HENSONLost 01
L#1 DoublesAmanda Irons / Nancy Barker vs Jeannette Ortiz / Leah Ann Tucker2-6, 4-6
2021-08-09vs FLYHS LEVKUSLost 01
L#1 DoublesStefanie McCarron / Amanda Irons vs Martina Levkus / Elayna Rathmann3-6, 4-6
2021-07-26vs CSRC VANEVERYLost 01
L#1 SinglesAmanda Irons vs Vincenta van Every5-7, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 4.0 - TWILIGHT - SOCO have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.42 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.91
Nancy Barker
published
3.81
Stefanie McCarron
published
JESSEE BARLOW
published 4
3.17
Amanda Irons
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 25% · published 3.5
2.81
Kirsten Matheson
published
Leah Greteman
published
Susan Lozanov
published
Teena Crum
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Nancy Barker + Amanda Irons3249% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Nancy Barker
116W–48L career · no lines in 2021
<1%76%24%
3.91
Stefanie McCarron
68W–50L career · no lines in 2021
1%92%7%
3.81
4
JESSEE BARLOW
9W–9L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
3.5
Amanda Irons
26W–36L career · 4 lines in 2021
9%90%1%
3.17
Kirsten Matheson
14W–23L career · no lines in 2021
93%7%<1%
2.81
Leah Greteman
4W–6L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Susan Lozanov
2W–11L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Teena Crum
3W–7L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.