Teams

CSRC VANEVERY

2021 CTA TWILIGHT - SOCO · WOMEN 4.0 - TWILIGHT - SOCO

8 players · average NTRP 3.88 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2021-09-06vs PBTC HENSONLost 02
L#1 DoublesSara Breese / Diana Garcia-Poore vs Paula Henson / Leah Ann Tucker6-3, 1-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesSandra Cook / Caron Dumler vs Alyssa Parga / Linda Sanchez3-6, 2-6
2021-08-30vs FLYHS LEVKUSWon 10
W#2 DoublesCandace McCollett / Trista Niemann vs Chelsey Wright / Diane Bean6-1, 6-2
2021-08-23vs CSRC MCPHERSONWon 21
W#1 DoublesSara Breese / Diana Garcia-Poore vs Stacey Heisler / Margaret Molek-Otto3-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#1 SinglesCandace McCollett vs Stephanie King3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#2 DoublesSandra Cook / Caron Dumler vs Amy Laird / Dawn Rickert6-4, 2-6, 1-0
2021-08-16vs LFTCS MOORELost 01
L#1 DoublesCandace McCollett / Trista Niemann vs Deborah Scruggs / Tatiana Merkoulova6-7, 6-2, 0-1
2021-08-09vs LFTCS KALTENBACHERWon 10
W#2 DoublesSara Breese / Stephanie Brock vs Susan Hilton / Jennifer Madden6-2, 6-0
2021-07-26vs MEMPK MCCARRONWon 10
W#1 DoublesSara Breese / Diane Jackson vs Nancy Barker / Teena Crum6-2, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 4.0 - TWILIGHT - SOCO have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.42 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.65
Candace McCollett
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 4
3.64
Sara Breese
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.51
3.30
Stephanie Brock
published
3.29
Vincenta van Every
published
3.15
Caron Dumler
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Jennifer Kapitan
published
Sandra Cook
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Diana Garcia-Poore + Sara Breese2848% games+2.2% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Candace McCollett
58W–104L career · 3 lines in 2021
12%88%<1%
3.65
4
Sara Breese
96W–84L career · 4 lines in 2021
15%85%<1%
3.64
4
Diana Garcia-Poore
21W–38L career · no lines in 2021
46%54%<1%
3.51
Stephanie Brock
57W–29L career · no lines in 2021
1%93%6%
3.30
Vincenta van Every
41W–39L career · no lines in 2021
1%93%5%
3.29
3.5
Caron Dumler
53W–59L career · 2 lines in 2021
13%86%<1%
3.15
Jennifer Kapitan
43W–38L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Sandra Cook
24W–31L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.