Teams

CSRC MCPHERSON

2021 CTA TWILIGHT - SOCO · WOMEN 4.0 - TWILIGHT - SOCO

8 players · average NTRP 3.86 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2021-09-06vs FLYHS LEVKUSLost 02
L#1 DoublesAmy Laird / Stacey Heisler vs Leslie Jaworowski / Maggie Wilson1-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesKady Hommel / Susan Wilklow vs Amy Saxby / Chelsey Wright6-1, 1-6, 0-1
2021-08-30vs MEMPK MCCARRONSplit 11
L#1 DoublesMargaret Molek-Otto / Kady Hommel vs Stefanie McCarron / Teena Crum6-1, 6-7, 0-1
W#2 DoublesSusan Wilklow / Stacey Heisler vs Susan Lozanov / Kirsten Matheson6-2, 6-1
2021-08-23vs CSRC VANEVERYLost 02
L#1 DoublesStacey Heisler / Margaret Molek-Otto vs Sara Breese / Diana Garcia-Poore6-3, 2-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesAmy Laird / Dawn Rickert vs Sandra Cook / Caron Dumler4-6, 6-2, 0-1
2021-08-16vs LFTCS KALTENBACHERLost 02
L#1 DoublesKady Hommel / Dawn Rickert vs Susan Hilton / Cindy Yetter3-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesHolly Strack / Susan Wilklow vs Chantel Rosario / Salome D'Silva1-6, 4-6
2021-08-09vs PBTC HENSONLost 01
L#2 DoublesStacey Heisler / Amy Laird vs Alyssa Parga / Jeannette Ortiz4-6, 3-6
2021-08-02vs LFTCS MOOREWon 10
W#2 DoublesKady Hommel / Dawn Rickert vs Susan Moore / Daria Parker6-7, 6-2, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 4.0 - TWILIGHT - SOCO have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.49 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Amy Laird
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
Holly Strack
published 4
3.75
Kady Hommel
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.67
Stacey Heisler
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.53
Wendy Rhoten
published 4
3.44
Susan Wilklow
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.33
Margaret Molek-Otto
published 3.5
3.24
Lori McPherson
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lori McPherson + Kady Hommel4545% games+0.4% vs expected
Amy Laird + Kady Hommel8849% games−1.7% vs expected
Holly Strack + Margaret Molek-Otto134 matchesnot enough data
Amy Laird + Lori McPherson134 matchesnot enough data
Holly Strack + Susan Wilklow213 matchesnot enough data
Kady Hommel + Margaret Molek-Otto123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Amy Laird
38W–55L career · type A · 3 lines in 2021
not enough data
4
Holly Strack
18W–17L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
4
Kady Hommel
102W–88L career · 4 lines in 2021
3%95%3%
3.75
4
Stacey Heisler
44W–71L career · 4 lines in 2021
9%90%1%
3.67
4
Wendy Rhoten
33W–52L career · type A · no lines in 2021
40%60%<1%
3.53
3.5
Susan Wilklow
18W–37L career · 3 lines in 2021
<1%69%31%
3.44
3.5
Margaret Molek-Otto
4W–12L career · no lines in 2021
<1%89%10%
3.33
Lori McPherson
25W–38L career · no lines in 2021
3%95%2%
3.24

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.