← Teams

THPRD-Adcock/Kershaw

2019 Adult 18 & Over · 4.0 Women

5 players · average NTRP 4 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 3.58 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.80
Coral Nash
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 4.5
3.58
Dongju Won
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.55
Margaret Sivertsen
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.52
Ellen Bowman
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 17% · published 3.5
3.45
Lynn Sosa
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 4
Results17 ties
2019-09-20Won 1–0
W#3 DoublesJustin Shull / Margaret Sivertsen vs Jimmy Kayongo / Rebecca Kinworthy6-3, 6-3
2019-09-20Won 1–0
W#3 DoublesJustin Shull / Margaret Sivertsen vs Jen Hein / James Degrasse6-3, 3-6, 1-0
2019-08-24Won 1–0
W#2 DoublesErica Tsuruta / Lynn Sosa vs Carly Oberg / Linda Baker2-6, 7-6, 1-0
2019-08-23Lost 0–1
L#2 DoublesErica Tsuruta / Lynn Sosa vs Courtenay Dey / Sydney Ihde3-6, 6-1, 1-0
2019-07-19Won 1–0
W#3 DoublesJustin Shull / Margaret Sivertsen vs Anna Jarman / Adam Hrebeniuk7-5, 6-2
2019-07-14Lost 0–1
L#1 DoublesCarrie Fisher / Lynn Sosa vs Tonya Dirk / Emiko Kogure6-3, 3-6, 1-0
2019-07-13Lost 0–1
L#2 DoublesKathryn Smith / Lynn Sosa vs Jennifer Hill / Nancy Korenek-Leveque6-4, 6-3
2019-04-07Won 2–1
W#1 DoublesLynn Sosa / Erica Tsuruta vs Amy Graham / Keely Kopetz4-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#1 SinglesCoral Nash vs Mary Klinger6-2, 6-2
L#2 DoublesKim Gowie / Ellen Bowman vs Diane Middlebrooks / Kelly Asbridge6-3, 2-6, 1-0
2019-03-30Won 3–0
W#2 DoublesLynn Sosa / Erica Tsuruta vs Kay Dobashi / Chizuru Watanabe6-4, 6-2
W#2 SinglesCoral Nash vs Lisa Gangelhoff7-6, 6-2
W#3 DoublesEllen Bowman / Margaret Sivertsen vs Annette Garske / Courtney Ngai7-5, 7-5
2019-03-24Lost 0–1
L#2 SinglesCoral Nash vs Jamie Slonaker7-5, 7-5
2019-02-16Lost 1–2
L#1 DoublesLynn Sosa / Kyoko Adcock vs Heather Dudley / Sherri Sacconaghi7-5, 6-3
W#2 DoublesCarrie Pelz / Margaret Sivertsen vs Ann Skoog / Pat Berends6-4, 6-0
L#3 DoublesEllen Bowman / Dongju Won vs Kathleen Budnick / Kristin Lyman4-6, 6-4, 1-0
2019-02-10Won 2–1
L#1 DoublesAlyssa Morrison Corvino / Lynn Sosa vs Katherine Kralj / Crystal Bryant6-4, 6-2
W#2 SinglesCoral Nash vs Linda Binns6-1, 6-2
W#3 DoublesAngie Lee / Dongju Won vs Lisa Clevenger / Itsuko Day6-4, 6-4
2019-02-01Won 1–0
W#3 DoublesAngie Lee / Dongju Won vs Sally Lovett / Kim Wright6-0, 6-4
2019-01-12Won 2–1
L#2 DoublesCarrie Pelz / Margaret Sivertsen vs Juan Li / Shannon Neal6-3, 6-2
W#2 SinglesCoral Nash vs Kristin Spear6-2, 6-1
W#3 DoublesEllen Bowman / Hideko Kershaw vs Laura Rundle / Andrea Yao7-6, 6-7, 1-0
2019-01-05Won 2–0
W#1 SinglesCoral Nash vs Sally Murdoch6-3, 6-2
W#2 DoublesLynn Sosa / Erica Tsuruta vs Judith Kobin / Dalika Crawford6-4, 6-2
2018-12-07Lost 0–1
L#2 DoublesDongju Won / Keisuke Komine vs Connor Picken / Sarah Ferrer6-4, 6-1
2018-12-01Lost 0–1
L#2 DoublesLynn Sosa / Erica Tsuruta vs Jan Rothert / Linda Paulk6-2, 3-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

4.5
Coral Nash
39W–69L career
67%33%0%
3.80
4
Dongju Won
67W–50L career
16%84%0%
3.58
4
Margaret Sivertsen
39W–44L career
24%76%0%
3.55
3.5
Ellen Bowman
40W–94L career
0%76%24%
3.52
4
Lynn Sosa
73W–57L career
48%52%0%
3.45

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.