Teams

Bailey/Nashville

2025 Adult 18 & Over - Nashville · 3.0 Women - Monday AM

12 players · average NTRP 3.00 / TENNESSEE

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2025-04-30vs Hayslip/NashvilleWon 30
W#1 DoublesSallie Cole / Heather Burkholder vs Melissa Hayslip / Shanoa Eastland7-6, 6-1
W#1 SinglesMaryann Neward vs Margaret Sheena de Giorgio7-5, 6-1
W#2 DoublesCrystal Freeburg / Kim Thorsby vs Annie Pollard / Amy Woosley6-1, 6-1
2025-04-28vs Myers/NashvilleSplit 22
L#1 DoublesKim Thorsby / Meg Sandman vs Ashley Vevoda / Abigail Fishbone0-6, 2-6
W#1 SinglesMaryann Neward vs Catherine Nail6-0, 6-0
L#2 DoublesKellyn Bailey / Meredith Smith vs Courtney Sanders / Lauren Levesque6-2, 2-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesEmily Bryan / Kristin Reichert vs Sabrina Below / Stevie Leonard6-2, 6-1
2025-04-16vs Knight/NashvilleWon 31
W#1 DoublesCrystal Freeburg / Maryann Neward vs Stephanie Knight / Mary Beth Riley2-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#2 DoublesKellyn Bailey / Portia Fulk vs Rachel Day / Dana Atkins7-6, 2-6, 0-1
W#2 SinglesSallie Cole vs Elizabeth Rich6-3, 6-0
W#3 DoublesLauren Tanner / Kim Thorsby vs Kristin Porter / Lauren Glascock6-1, 6-1
2025-04-14vs Hayslip/NashvilleLost 13
W#1 DoublesKellyn Bailey / Sallie Cole vs Melissa Hayslip / Shanoa Eastland4-6, 7-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesLauren Tanner / Emily Bryan vs Shauna Bowers / Whitney Jackson6-7, 6-1, 0-1
L#2 SinglesKristin Reichert vs Laura Cates1-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesStephanie Warner / Portia Fulk vs Margaret Sheena de Giorgio / Mary Oxford3-6, 2-6
2025-04-04vs Fisher/Burton/NashvilleLost 23
L#1 DoublesHeather Burkholder / Kellyn Bailey vs Melissa Burton / Mary Katherine Seibels3-6, 4-6
W#1 SinglesMaryann Neward vs Emily Pierre6-7, 6-4, 1-0
L#2 DoublesCrystal Freeburg / Meg Sandman vs Emily Johnson / Kelli Alarcon1-6, 4-6
W#2 SinglesSallie Cole vs Ivy Frazer6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesKim Thorsby / Portia Fulk vs Nobu Junge / Resha Blivens2-6, 5-7
2025-03-24vs Hopson/NashvilleLost 13
L#1 DoublesCrystal Freeburg / Kim Thorsby vs Marcy Burridge / Ashley Watson1-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesMeredith Smith / Heather Burkholder vs Barbara Zwerner / Jessica Northington6-4, 6-4
L#2 SinglesKristin Reichert vs Elizabeth Green6-4, 3-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesJennifer Miller / Lauren McLaughlin vs Helen Hopson / Anna Stiller6-4, 4-6, 0-1
2025-03-17vs Myers/NashvilleWon 50
W#1 DoublesCrystal Freeburg / Sallie Cole vs Nicole Covey / Gefi Ivey6-3, 3-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesMaryann Neward vs Stevie Leonard6-0, 6-1
W#2 DoublesJennifer Miller / Meg Sandman vs Lisa Thompson / Lauren Levesque3-6, 7-5, 1-0
W#2 SinglesHeather Burkholder vs Sabrina Below6-4, 6-3
W#3 DoublesKellyn Bailey / Lauren McLaughlin vs Rachel Stovall / Darby Walden6-2, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Women - Monday AM have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.67 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.05
Lauren McLaughlin
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.91
Emily Bryan
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #1 Doubles 14% · published 3
2.86
Kellyn Bailey
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
2.85
Meg Sandman
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.74
Maryann Neward
usually #1 Singles 80%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published
2.73
Heather Burkholder
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.71
Sallie Cole
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Singles 40% · published
2.69
Kim Thorsby
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
2.60
Crystal Freeburg
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.48
Kristin Reichert
usually #1 Doubles 43%, also #2 Singles 29% · published
2.28
Stephanie Warner
usually #1 Singles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.18
Portia Fulk
usually #2 Doubles 29%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Portia Fulk + Kim Thorsby6749% games+15.0% vs expected
Kellyn Bailey + Sallie Cole7163% games+14.9% vs expected
Kristin Reichert + Meg Sandman3447% games+6.5% vs expected
Stephanie Warner + Kim Thorsby303 matchesnot enough data
Sallie Cole + Kim Thorsby123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Lauren McLaughlin
25W–2L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%34%66%
3.05
3
Emily Bryan
29W–5L career · 7 lines in 2025
<1%76%24%
2.91
Kellyn Bailey
28W–8L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%85%15%
2.86
Meg Sandman
10W–9L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%88%12%
2.85
Maryann Neward
15W–12L career · 5 lines in 2025
3%94%2%
2.74
3
Heather Burkholder
15W–6L career · 4 lines in 2025
4%94%2%
2.73
Sallie Cole
20W–8L career · 5 lines in 2025
6%93%1%
2.71
Kim Thorsby
17W–16L career · 5 lines in 2025
8%92%1%
2.69
3
Crystal Freeburg
15W–11L career · 5 lines in 2025
22%78%<1%
2.60
Kristin Reichert
13W–13L career · 7 lines in 2025
0%56%44%
2.48
Stephanie Warner
10W–14L career · 6 lines in 2025
0%96%4%
2.28
Portia Fulk
13W–18L career · 7 lines in 2025
0%99%1%
2.18

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.