Teams

KY/LEX/Doctrow/Lykins

2023 USTA LEAGUE 18 & Over SOUTHERN COMBO DOUBLES LEXINGTON · 5.5 ADULT WOMEN

14 players · average NTRP 3.17 / KENTUCKY

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for 5.5 ADULT WOMEN have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.05 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.46
Lucy Butt
published
3.35
Dainn Park
published 3.5
3.35
Brooke Marnitz
published 3.5
3.34
Emily Pernice
published
3.32
Laura Kennoy
published
3.20
Robbie Doctrow
published
3.05
Sarah Back
published
2.97
Madison Liford
published
2.79
Patty Ni
published 3
2.76
Leah Lykins
published
Brooke Hamilton
published 3
2.52
2.45
Ashley Gillispie
published 3
Meredith Ginn Lam
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Leah Lykins + Brooke Marnitz4171% games+22.9% vs expected
Laura Kennoy + Brooke Marnitz5552% games+9.3% vs expected
Madison Liford + Patty Ni123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Lucy Butt
23W–6L career · no lines in 2023
<1%61%39%
3.46
3.5
Dainn Park
34W–19L career · no lines in 2023
1%85%15%
3.35
3.5
Brooke Marnitz
21W–8L career · no lines in 2023
1%85%15%
3.35
Emily Pernice
29W–28L career · no lines in 2023
1%86%13%
3.34
Laura Kennoy
21W–29L career · no lines in 2023
1%89%10%
3.32
Robbie Doctrow
7W–9L career · no lines in 2023
8%91%2%
3.20
Sarah Back
13W–9L career · no lines in 2023
<1%36%64%
3.05
Madison Liford
20W–12L career · no lines in 2023
<1%58%42%
2.97
3
Patty Ni
23W–27L career · no lines in 2023
2%91%7%
2.79
Leah Lykins
36W–38L career · no lines in 2023
3%92%4%
2.76
3
Brooke Hamilton
0W–3L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
3
Brittni Fain-Marnitz
16W–14L career · no lines in 2023
46%54%<1%
2.52
3
Ashley Gillispie
6W–8L career · no lines in 2023
65%35%<1%
2.45
Meredith Ginn Lam
14W–15L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.