Teams

DC Tennis Club

2026 Washington D.C. Singles · Washington D.C. Singles 3.0 Women

8 players · average NTRP 2.90 / WASHINGTON D.C.

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule10 played
2026-08-09vs Spin & TonicWon 30
W#1 SinglesJennifer Ney vs Ayanna Charles6-3, 3-6, 1-0
W#2 SinglesBethany Warren vs Wendy Harman6-0, 6-0
W#3 SinglesAlyson Musser vs Jeanne Acquadro6-3, 5-0
2026-08-08vs Pair JordansWon 10
W#2 SinglesJennifer Ney vs Meredith Huddle6-3, 5-5
2026-08-02vs Single Lady Noon BallersLost 01
L#3 SinglesJennifer Ney vs Anjali Garg3-6, 3-6
2026-08-01vs Queen BeesWon 10
W#2 SinglesMeaghan Davant vs Emily McHarg6-4, 3-2
2026-07-26vs SpinergyLost 01
L#3 SinglesJennifer Ney vs Lily Schwegler0-6, 2-6
2026-07-25vs Spin & TonicSplit 11
W#1 SinglesJennifer Ney vs Wendy Harman6-2, 6-3
L#2 SinglesMeaghan Davant vs Ayanna Charles0-6, 0-6
2026-07-11vs WangWon 10
W#1 SinglesJennifer Ney vs Miranda Liu4-6, 4-1
2026-07-05vs Single Lady Noon BallersLost 01
L#3 SinglesJennifer Ney vs Socheata Kim2-6, 1-5
2026-06-20vs Pair JordansLost 01
L#3 SinglesJennifer Ney vs Fri-Atsoh AchiriMofor6-4, 3-5
2026-06-20vs The NETworkWon 10
W#1 SinglesJennifer Ney vs Kali Keller7-5, 3-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings7 teams · Washington D.C. Singles 3.0 Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1No Man's Land05141463
2Pair Jordans051051094
3Set2Win05961087
4Single Lady Noon Ballers051141294
5Spinergy058714107
6Wang0601833193
7DC Tennis Club0751628195

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.83 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.25
Bethany Warren
usually #2 Singles 100% · published 3
2.97
Jennifer Ney
usually #3 Singles 44%, also #1 Singles 44% · published 3
2.88
Meaghan Davant
usually #2 Singles 100% · published 3
2.82
Alyson Musser
usually #3 Singles 100% · published 3
2.78
Nadia Asancheyev
published
2.55
Breanne Chen
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published 2.5
2.52
Ruth Fisher
published
Kaitlin Bell
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Bethany Warren
27W–7L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%4%96%
3.25
3
Jennifer Ney
31W–50L career · 9 lines in 2026
<1%58%42%
2.97
3
Meaghan Davant
21W–39L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%79%20%
2.88
3
Alyson Musser
23W–21L career · 1 line in 2026
1%89%10%
2.82
Nadia Asancheyev
29W–26L career · no lines in 2026
2%92%6%
2.78
2.5
Breanne Chen
19W–22L career · 6 lines in 2026
0%37%63%
2.55
Ruth Fisher
12W–20L career · no lines in 2026
43%57%<1%
2.52
Kaitlin Bell
10W–12L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.