Teams

Pair Jordans

2026 Washington D.C. Singles · Washington D.C. Singles 3.5 Women

8 players · average NTRP 3.30 / WASHINGTON D.C.

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2026-08-16vs Set2WinWon 21
L#1 SinglesFri-Atsoh AchiriMofor vs TOBI PARK1-6, 1-6
W#2 SinglesLule Rault vs Elham Tavassoli6-1, 5-2
W#3 SinglesTennille Goff vs Claire Graebner6-1, 6-0
2026-08-08vs DC Tennis ClubWon 21
W#1 SinglesClaire Weinrib vs Shuying Zhao6-2, 3-1
L#2 SinglesMeredith Huddle vs Jennifer Ney3-6, 5-5
W#3 SinglesAdriene Jordan vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2026-07-18vs SpinergyWon 21
L#1 SinglesLena Brandenburg vs Qiuxian Li2-6, 1-6
W#2 SinglesClaire Weinrib vs Pin Satjayakorn6-0, 6-0
W#3 SinglesAdriene Jordan vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2026-07-12vs WangWon 30
W#1 SinglesMia Piansay vs Wenbo Li7-6, 2-0
W#2 SinglesTennille Goff vs Chloe Han6-3, 5-3
W#3 SinglesMeredith Huddle vs Qing Lin6-1, 6-0
2026-07-05vs Set2WinWon 21
W#1 SinglesLule Rault vs Catherine Donaldson6-4, 5-1
L#2 SinglesAdriene Jordan vs TOBI PARK0-6, 0-6
W#3 SinglesMia Piansay vs Amy Cahoon7-5, 3-4
2026-06-20vs DC Tennis ClubLost 12
L#1 SinglesMeredith Huddle vs Whitney Paxson2-6, 4-4
L#2 SinglesMia Piansay vs Suzanne Bell6-7, 0-3
W#3 SinglesFri-Atsoh AchiriMofor vs Jennifer Ney6-4, 3-5
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings7 teams · Washington D.C. Singles 3.5 Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1No Man's Land05141463
2Pair Jordans051051094
3Set2Win05961087
4Single Lady Noon Ballers051141294
5Spinergy058714107
6Wang0601833193
7DC Tennis Club0751628195

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.27 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.55
Lule Rault
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published
3.46
Claire Weinrib
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published 3.5
3.25
Fri-Atsoh AchiriMofor
usually #3 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published
3.22
Mia Piansay
usually #2 Singles 33%, also #3 Singles 33% · published 3.5
3.15
Meredith Huddle
usually #1 Singles 33%, also #3 Singles 33% · published 3
3.14
Adriene Jordan
usually #3 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published 3.5
3.14
Lena Brandenburg
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3
Tennille Goff
usually #3 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Lule Rault
12W–15L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%35%65%
3.55
3.5
Claire Weinrib
11W–12L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%60%40%
3.46
Fri-Atsoh AchiriMofor
4W–17L career · 2 lines in 2026
4%93%4%
3.25
3.5
Mia Piansay
244W–303L career · 3 lines in 2026
6%92%2%
3.22
3
Meredith Huddle
28W–21L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%14%86%
3.15
3.5
Adriene Jordan
19W–70L career · type S · 3 lines in 2026
16%84%1%
3.14
3
Lena Brandenburg
92W–73L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%16%84%
3.14
Tennille Goff
8W–20L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.