Teams

Spinergy

2026 Washington D.C. Singles · Washington D.C. Singles 3.5 Women

6 players · average NTRP 3.17 / WASHINGTON D.C.

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2026-08-02vs No Man's LandLost 12
L#1 SinglesLily Schwegler vs Wendy Burger4-6, 3-5
L#2 SinglesNancy Hersh vs Olivia Tate3-6, 2-4
W#3 SinglesBella Bidzhieva vs Noeline Arul6-4, 1-0
2026-07-26vs DC Tennis ClubWon 21
W#1 SinglesXuan Du vs Elizabeth Plaza6-3, 4-2
L#2 SinglesBella Bidzhieva vs Suzanne Bell0-6, 3-6
W#3 SinglesLily Schwegler vs Jennifer Ney6-0, 6-2
2026-07-25vs Single Lady Noon BallersLost 12
L#1 SinglesXuan Du vs Anjali Garg7-6, 0-2
L#2 SinglesPin Satjayakorn vs Socheata Kim2-6, 3-4
W#3 SinglesQiuxian Li vs Hannah Yoo6-1, 6-1
2026-07-19vs WangWon 30
W#1 SinglesLily Schwegler vs Chloe Han6-3, 6-2
W#2 SinglesNancy Hersh vs Xin Guan6-2, 2-3
W#3 SinglesPin Satjayakorn vs Qing Lin6-4, 2-2
2026-07-18vs Pair JordansSplit 11
W#1 SinglesQiuxian Li vs Lena Brandenburg6-2, 6-1
L#2 SinglesPin Satjayakorn vs Claire Weinrib0-6, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings7 teams · Washington D.C. Singles 3.5 Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1No Man's Land05141463
2Pair Jordans051051094
3Set2Win05961087
4Single Lady Noon Ballers051141294
5Spinergy058714107
6Wang0601833193
7DC Tennis Club0751628195

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.24 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.42
Qiuxian Li
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #3 Singles 50% · published 3
3.38
Bella Bidzhieva
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #3 Singles 50% · published 3.5
3.23
Xuan Du
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
3.22
Nancy Hersh
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
3.17
Lily Schwegler
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #3 Singles 33% · published
3.02
Pin Satjayakorn
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #3 Singles 33% · published 3
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Qiuxian Li
50W–24L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%<1%>99%
3.42
3.5
Bella Bidzhieva
79W–61L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%80%20%
3.38
Xuan Du
20W–10L career · 2 lines in 2026
5%92%3%
3.23
Nancy Hersh
5W–7L career · 2 lines in 2026
6%92%2%
3.22
Lily Schwegler
7W–5L career · 3 lines in 2026
12%88%1%
3.17
3
Pin Satjayakorn
13W–24L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%43%57%
3.02

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.