Teams

Wang

2026 Washington D.C. Singles · Washington D.C. Singles 3.5 Women

5 players · average NTRP 3.00 / WASHINGTON D.C.

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2026-08-23vs Set2WinSplit 11
L#1 SinglesWenbo Li vs Elham Tavassoli3-6, 2-3
W#2 SinglesQing Lin vs Vicky White Hall6-4, 4-3
2026-08-08vs No Man's LandLost 02
L#2 SinglesShan Jiang vs Wendy Burger1-6, 1-6
L#3 SinglesQing Lin vs Mary Binecki1-6, 1-6
2026-08-02vs Set2WinLost 02
L#1 SinglesQing Lin vs TOBI PARK2-6, 0-3
L#3 SinglesShan Jiang vs Claire Graebner5-7, 2-4
2026-07-19vs SpinergyLost 01
L#3 SinglesQing Lin vs Pin Satjayakorn4-6, 2-2
2026-07-12vs Pair JordansLost 02
L#1 SinglesWenbo Li vs Mia Piansay6-7, 0-2
L#3 SinglesQing Lin vs Meredith Huddle1-6, 0-6
2026-06-27vs Single Lady Noon BallersLost 01
L#1 SinglesWenbo Li vs Diem Salmon6-4, 1-3
2026-06-21vs No Man's LandLost 02
L#1 SinglesWenbo Li vs Margaret Stump3-6, 0-4
L#2 SinglesShan Jiang vs Olivia Tate0-6, 5-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings7 teams · Washington D.C. Singles 3.5 Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1No Man's Land05141463
2Pair Jordans051051094
3Set2Win05961087
4Single Lady Noon Ballers051141294
5Spinergy058714107
6Wang0601833193
7DC Tennis Club0751628195

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.98 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.11
Shan Jiang
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #3 Singles 33% · published
3.03
Qing Lin
usually #3 Singles 60%, also #1 Singles 20% · published
3.01
Wenbo Li
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
2.91
Chloe Han
usually #2 Singles 38%, also #1 Singles 38% · published 3
2.83
Xin Guan
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #1 Singles 17% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Shan Jiang
4W–13L career · 3 lines in 2026
21%78%<1%
3.11
Qing Lin
20W–16L career · 5 lines in 2026
42%58%<1%
3.03
Wenbo Li
3W–8L career · 4 lines in 2026
48%52%<1%
3.01
3
Chloe Han
16W–25L career · 8 lines in 2026
<1%74%25%
2.91
Xin Guan
7W–11L career · 6 lines in 2026
1%88%11%
2.83

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.