Teams

TRU:Baseline Battlers:Keene/DeMarco

2021 EMA Adult 18 & Over Women · 3.0 Women

13 players · average NTRP / EASTERN MASSACHUSETTS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2021-07-16vs SFT:Spark F&T:Hemley/ShanahanLost 04
L#1 DoublesLora Bojsen / Sarah Bojsen vs Ellen Thibodeau / Jennifer Wieckowski5-7, 4-6
L#2 DoublesDonna Keene / Marie Normoyle vs Cheryl Hemley / Pamela Vazquez1-6, 1-6
L#2 SinglesYoko Sano vs Andrea Arena0-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesCheryl Rousseau / Pamela Rheault vs Gracie Aguero / Elizabeth Koontz4-6, 4-6
2021-07-14vs SFT:Spark F&T Blue:SidemanLost 13
L#1 DoublesLora Bojsen / Donna Keene vs Kellie VanRavestyn / Lindsay Sideman5-7, 4-6
L#2 DoublesDeborah Cyr / Marie Normoyle vs Linda Walsh / Cathleen Burke4-6, 2-6
L#2 SinglesYoko Sano vs Angela Hayden2-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesCorni Forster / Linda Smolko vs Nancy Greeley / Chelsie Foster6-4, 6-4
2021-07-01vs IRCC:Indian Ridge CC:EdelmannWon 30
W#1 DoublesLinda Feng / Donna Keene vs Tabitha Ross / Kristina Kashanek6-4, 6-2
W#2 DoublesDeborah Cyr / Marie Normoyle vs Christine Peckham / Tricia Zullo6-3, 6-4
W#3 DoublesPamela Rheault / Linda Smolko vs Kara McNamara / Tara Dunham6-4, 4-6, 1-0
2021-06-23vs CED:Cedardale Green:MooreLost 13
W#1 DoublesLora Bojsen / Sarah Bojsen vs Colene Nardone / Sandra Wellman6-4, 6-4
L#2 DoublesSharon Sell / Andreea Bancila vs Kristen Guthrie / Kaitlin Torossian4-6, 4-6
L#2 SinglesYoko Sano vs Toni Cavallini0-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesSharon Foreman / Corni Forster vs Lori McHugh / Nicole Friel3-6, 1-6
2021-06-16vs IRCC:Indian Ridge CC:EdelmannWon 31
W#1 DoublesSarah Bojsen / Lora Bojsen vs Charlene Deroche / Amy Hauser6-1, 6-3
W#1 SinglesLinda Feng vs Tricia Zullo6-2, 2-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesCheryl Rousseau / Yoko Sano vs Christine Peckham / Tabitha Ross6-3, 6-4
L#3 DoublesPamela Rheault / Susan Phelan vs Jennifer Savino / Susyn Lichtenberg1-6, 2-6
2021-06-09vs SFT:Spark F&T Blue:SidemanLost 13
W#1 DoublesSharon Sell / Linda Feng vs Diane Sollars / Christine Coupe6-3, 6-4
L#2 DoublesDeborah Cyr / Marie Normoyle vs Diane Gurry / Angela Hayden3-6, 1-6
L#2 SinglesYoko Sano vs Laura Harley2-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesNoreen Rowe / Claire Shaby vs Nancy Greeley / Deborah DonovanPerez1-6, 2-6
2021-06-02vs SFT:Spark F&T:Hemley/ShanahanLost 13
L#1 DoublesSharon Sell / Kathryn Maietta vs Pamela Vazquez / Elizabeth Koontz4-6, 6-7
L#1 SinglesCheryl Rousseau vs Cheryl Hemley5-7, 2-5
W#2 DoublesLora Bojsen / Sarah Bojsen vs Elisabeth Abbe / Andrea Arena7-6, 6-2
L#3 DoublesSusan Phelan / Pamela Rheault vs Deanne McGuinness / Lisa Jackson6-7, 3-6
2021-05-20vs CED:Cedardale Green:MooreLost 12
W#1 DoublesLinda Feng / Sharon Sell vs Wendy Bacheller / Kaitlin Torossian7-6, 6-2
L#2 DoublesMarie Normoyle / Linda Smolko vs Kristen Guthrie / Colene Nardone2-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesDeborah Cyr / Corni Forster vs Abby Sleeper / Sandra Wellman2-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings30 teams · 3.0 Women
ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.88 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.19
Linda Feng
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #1 Singles 25% · published
2.96
Lora Bojsen
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
2.77
Yoko Sano
usually #2 Singles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
2.61
Marie Normoyle
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Cheryl Rousseau
usually #1 Singles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Claire Shaby
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Corni Forster
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Leo DeMarco
published
Linda Smolko
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Marie-Alene Orival
published
Noreen Rowe
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Pamela Rheault
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Sharon Sell
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lora Bojsen + Linda Feng4156% gamesnot enough data
Cheryl Rousseau + Yoko Sano314 matchesnot enough data
Sharon Sell + Linda Feng303 matchesnot enough data
Lora Bojsen + Yoko Sano213 matchesnot enough data
Corni Forster + Linda Smolko213 matchesnot enough data
Linda Smolko + Marie Normoyle123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Linda Feng
74W–61L career · 4 lines in 2021
8%91%1%
3.19
Lora Bojsen
88W–40L career · 5 lines in 2021
<1%62%38%
2.96
Yoko Sano
56W–49L career · 5 lines in 2021
2%94%4%
2.77
Marie Normoyle
25W–34L career · 5 lines in 2021
21%79%<1%
2.61
Cheryl Rousseau
11W–14L career · 3 lines in 2021
not enough data
Claire Shaby
3W–5L career · 1 line in 2021
not enough data
Corni Forster
2W–6L career · 3 lines in 2021
not enough data
Leo DeMarco
34W–19L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Linda Smolko
5W–23L career · 3 lines in 2021
not enough data
Marie-Alene Orival
13W–10L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Noreen Rowe
1W–8L career · 1 line in 2021
not enough data
Pamela Rheault
6W–5L career · 4 lines in 2021
not enough data
Sharon Sell
47W–36L career · 4 lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.