Teams

SSY:SSYMCA:Smith/Chadwick

2021 EMA Adult 18 & Over Women · 3.0 Women

8 players · average NTRP 3.50 / EASTERN MASSACHUSETTS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2021-06-23vs LAK:Lakeville:KimballLost 04
L#1 DoublesBeth Chadwick / Cathy Delorie vs Anna Kimball / Melissa Dorr1-6, 5-7
L#1 SinglesJohanna Burwell vs Danielle Nutter0-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesRuth Mcgee / Jerilyn Tyrrell vs Tracy Charbonnier / Catherine Melville3-6, 6-7
L#3 DoublesJerusha Shatzkamer / Leanne Carlson vs Heidi Bonito / Waldron Schultz1-6, 2-6
2021-06-16vs BBC:Brown Billone:DonovanSplit 22
W#1 DoublesJulie Smith / Johanna Burwell vs Sonja Marcheselli / Sharyn Chabot6-3, 6-3
W#2 DoublesRuth Mcgee / Cathy Delorie vs Robin Kublin / Stephanie Shanley3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#2 SinglesLeanne Carlson vs Heather Luke6-4, 2-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesJerilyn Tyrrell / Jerusha Shatzkamer vs Melissa Prag / Julie Halvorsen4-6, 6-0, 0-1
2021-06-09vs WEY:Weymouth Blue:JenneyWon 32
W#1 DoublesBeth Chadwick / Ruth Mcgee vs Laura Gray / Lisa Jenney6-3, 6-4
L#1 SinglesCathy Delorie vs Maxine Tull2-6, 6-2, 0-1
W#2 DoublesJulie Smith / Leanne Carlson vs Erin Sisk / Dianne Bell7-6, 3-4, 1-0
L#2 SinglesJohanna Burwell vs Bianca Barinas Bradford2-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#3 DoublesAnna Nicholas / Jerusha Shatzkamer vs Teresa Zais / Dottie Puleo6-3, 6-3
2021-06-02vs SRF:Scituate:HorneWon 31
W#1 DoublesBeth Chadwick / Anna Nicholas vs Stacy Sturdy / Heather Dillon6-3, 6-1
W#2 DoublesJulie Smith / Cathy Delorie vs Georgia Driscoll / Megan Kiernan6-0, 6-0
W#2 SinglesRuth Mcgee vs Kimberly Spear4-6, 6-5, 1-0
L#3 DoublesJerusha Shatzkamer / Leanne Carlson vs Suzanne Russell / Kimberly Hansen6-0, 3-6, 0-1
L#1 DoublesJulie Smith / Beth Chadwick vs Lindsay Dupuy / Eryn Kelley4-6, 3-4
L#1 SinglesJohanna Burwell vs Lisa McCarthy1-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesRuth Mcgee / Anna Nicholas vs Anne Mehigan / Julie Petit6-1, 6-3
L#2 SinglesJerusha Shatzkamer vs Melissa Ripley1-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesJerilyn Tyrrell / Leanne Carlson vs Elizabeth Brown / Lynn Doxey0-6, 4-6
2021-05-19vs BCC:Black Rock:Bourque/O'BrienSplit 22
W#1 DoublesBeth Chadwick / Cathy Delorie vs Renee Besser / Julie Hoffman6-1, 6-4
L#2 DoublesRuth Mcgee / Mary Beth McGee vs Melissa Bourque / Katie OBrien3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#2 SinglesJerusha Shatzkamer vs Allie Christopher3-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesJerilyn Tyrrell / Leanne Carlson vs Kathryn Caulfield / Eleia Haywood6-4, 6-3
2021-05-12vs BCC:Black Rock Red:Lawrence/SmithLost 23
L#1 DoublesJulie Smith / Beth Chadwick vs Molly Smith / Suzanne Garland4-6, 4-6
L#1 SinglesJohanna Burwell vs Jessica Tower4-6, 6-5, 0-1
L#2 DoublesRuth Mcgee / Anna Nicholas vs Victoria Fine / Laura Lawrence7-6, 4-6, 0-1
W#2 SinglesCathy Delorie vs Cindy Enright6-0, 6-1
W#3 DoublesJerilyn Tyrrell / Leanne Carlson vs Maureen Ducey / Anne Matthews6-4, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings30 teams · 3.0 Women
ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.97 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Beth Chadwick
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.22
Ruth Mcgee
usually #2 Doubles 71%, also #2 Singles 14% · published
3.02
Cathy Delorie
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
2.94
Leanne Carlson
usually #3 Doubles 71%, also #2 Singles 14% · published
2.70
Jerusha Shatzkamer
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published
Jerilyn Tyrrell
usually #3 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
Johanna Burwell
usually #1 Singles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published
Mary Beth McGee
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Cathy Delorie + Ruth Mcgee5346% games−10.6% vs expected
Jerilyn Tyrrell + Jerusha Shatzkamer1835% games−12.9% vs expected
Jerilyn Tyrrell + Ruth Mcgee2348% gamesnot enough data
Beth Chadwick + Cathy Delorie314 matchesnot enough data
Beth Chadwick + Ruth Mcgee404 matchesnot enough data
Jerilyn Tyrrell + Cathy Delorie123 matchesnot enough data
Jerilyn Tyrrell + Johanna Burwell213 matchesnot enough data
Jerilyn Tyrrell + Leanne Carlson213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Beth Chadwick
23W–14L career · 6 lines in 2021
not enough data
Ruth Mcgee
29W–17L career · 7 lines in 2021
4%94%2%
3.22
3.5
Cathy Delorie
25W–14L career · 6 lines in 2021
43%57%<1%
3.02
Leanne Carlson
29W–20L career · 7 lines in 2021
<1%67%33%
2.94
Jerusha Shatzkamer
8W–36L career · 6 lines in 2021
99%1%<1%
2.70
Jerilyn Tyrrell
21W–21L career · 5 lines in 2021
not enough data
Johanna Burwell
19W–15L career · 5 lines in 2021
not enough data
Mary Beth McGee
9W–1L career · 1 line in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.