Teams

BWEL: BSC Wellesley:Hyams

2021 EMA Adult 18 & Over Women · 3.0 Women

11 players · average NTRP 3.00 / EASTERN MASSACHUSETTS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
L#1 DoublesSami Sinclair / Marci Blacker vs Janis Collins / Susan Chasen2-6, 2-6
W#1 SinglesQing Shi vs Samantha Polikowski6-4, 3-2
L#2 DoublesAlicia Ianiere / Abigail Harmon vs Barbara Hansberry / Madonna Cournoyer1-6, 3-6
W#2 SinglesLisa Howe vs Colleen McArtor6-2, 1-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesNicoletta Noor / Lynn Hyams vs Juliet Borja / Noriko Keirnan7-5, 2-6, 1-0
2021-07-07vs DED:Dedham:KruglakSplit 22
L#1 DoublesLauren Abeles / Lisa Howe vs Amy Kruglak / Kathleen Wetherby6-7, 4-1, 0-1
W#1 SinglesQing Shi vs Zhongling Li6-2, 5-2
W#2 DoublesNicoletta Noor / Mary Baker vs Gayle Secord / Catherine Deacon6-2, 6-2
L#3 DoublesPaulette Song / Abigail Harmon vs Lauren Korn / Mary Halpin1-6, 3-6
2021-06-30vs STC:Sportsmen's:Pilgrim/McKennaLost 14
L#1 DoublesLynn Hyams / Mary Baker vs Rachel Coppola / Alexa Martin4-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesQing Shi vs America Cutter1-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesAlicia Ianiere / Samira Farboodmanesh vs Kathryn Ellis / Tosin Olaniyan2-6, 1-6
W#2 SinglesLisa Howe vs Kathryn Link6-2, 6-4
L#3 DoublesJennifer Cramer / Marci Blacker vs Kathleen McKenna / Christina Suh2-6, 4-6
2021-06-16vs WAC:Waltham Blue:Morgan/CellucciLost 13
L#1 DoublesMarci Blacker / Jennifer Cramer vs Kieran Wong / Mui Tran0-6, 0-6
W#1 SinglesQing Shi vs Jennifer Morgan4-6, 3-2, 1-0
L#2 DoublesDebra Harvey / Samira Farboodmanesh vs Heather Condurso / Deborah Busa Cellucci3-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesLynn Hyams / Mary Baker vs Omega Bonnell-Bradley / Lizzie McQuillan4-6, 6-7
2021-06-02vs DED:Dedham:KruglakLost 03
L#1 SinglesQing Shi vs Zhongling Li7-5, 2-4, 0-1
L#2 DoublesMary Baker / Alicia Ianiere vs Mary Halpin / Gayle Secord3-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesNicoletta Noor / Samira Farboodmanesh vs Stephanie Pearlstein / Katie Stalcup1-6, 3-6
2021-05-26vs STC:Sportsmen's:Pilgrim/McKennaLost 13
L#1 DoublesLynn Hyams / Jennifer Cramer vs Pat Pilgrim / Elysia Cooke2-6, 3-6
W#1 SinglesQing Shi vs America Cutter7-6
L#2 DoublesDebra Harvey / Nicoletta Noor vs Christina Suh / Allyson Clappin3-6, 5-7
L#3 DoublesAbigail Harmon / Paulette Song vs Kathryn Ellis / Tosin Olaniyan1-6, 2-6
2021-05-19vs LTC:Lexington TC:Keirnan/PolikowskiSplit 22
W#1 SinglesQing Shi vs Elizabeth Kon6-2, 6-0
L#2 DoublesMarci Blacker / Mary Baker vs Kelly Dolan / Marlene Rockmore4-6, 6-1, 0-1
W#2 SinglesDebra Harvey vs Elaine Maynard6-3, 6-1
L#3 DoublesLisa Howe / Alicia Ianiere vs Colleen McArtor / Samantha Polikowski1-6, 1-6
2021-05-12vs WAC:Waltham Blue:Morgan/CellucciLost 04
L#1 DoublesPaulette Song / Lynn Hyams vs Carol Emerson / Connie Yuen2-6, 0-6
L#1 SinglesQing Shi vs Lindsey McCabe5-7, 4-3, 0-1
L#2 DoublesMary Baker / Alicia Ianiere vs Lizzie McQuillan / Maria Olagunju5-7, 4-6
L#3 DoublesMarci Blacker / Sami Sinclair vs Heather Condurso / Victoria Bacanurschi5-7, 5-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings30 teams · 3.0 Women
ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.61 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.31
Qing Shi
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
2.65
Marci Blacker
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
2.47
Nicoletta Noor
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
2.45
Abigail Harmon
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.43
Lynn Hyams
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
2.37
Paulette Song
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Alicia Ianiere
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published
Debra Harvey
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published
Lauren Abeles
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Lisa Howe
usually #2 Singles 44%, also #3 Doubles 44% · published
Mary Baker
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 17% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Nicoletta Noor + Lynn Hyams2539% games−12.5% vs expected
Nicoletta Noor + Debra Harvey044 matchesnot enough data
Alicia Ianiere + Paulette Song224 matchesnot enough data
Lynn Hyams + Abigail Harmon033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Qing Shi
42W–41L career · 17 lines in 2021
1%91%8%
3.31
Marci Blacker
20W–28L career · 5 lines in 2021
12%87%<1%
2.65
Nicoletta Noor
7W–26L career · 4 lines in 2021
60%40%<1%
2.47
3
Abigail Harmon
0W–15L career · 3 lines in 2021
66%34%<1%
2.45
Lynn Hyams
3W–31L career · 5 lines in 2021
71%29%<1%
2.43
Paulette Song
6W–27L career · 3 lines in 2021
84%16%<1%
2.37
Alicia Ianiere
2W–9L career · 5 lines in 2021
not enough data
Debra Harvey
4W–8L career · 3 lines in 2021
not enough data
Lauren Abeles
3W–9L career · 3 lines in 2021
not enough data
Lisa Howe
10W–10L career · 9 lines in 2021
not enough data
Mary Baker
3W–14L career · 6 lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.