Teams

Team Kaufman

2024 NMI Adult 55&O · 2024 NMI Adult 55&O 7.0W

11 players · average NTRP 3.50 / NORTHERN MICHIGAN

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2024-08-25vs Team SteeleLost 12
L#1 DoublesWendy Stackable / Jennifer Patten vs Eve Elden / Cynthia van Maanen6-4, 5-7, 0-1
L#2 DoublesLucia Elden / Barbara Newton-Tesarz vs Maggi Steele / Cynthia Fairbanks6-7, 5-7
W#3 DoublesJoAnn O'Connor / Renee Kaufman vs Diane Lindquist / Theresa Stack6-3, 6-0
2024-08-25vs Team SchollWon 21
L#1 DoublesJacqueline Ray / Janet Popper vs Kim Scholl / Jennifer Buck1-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesJennifer Patten / Wendy Stackable vs Dianne Litzenburger / Deborah Miller6-3, 6-2
W#3 DoublesAlisia Pulella / Barbara Newton-Tesarz vs Lynne Tollas / Valerie Walsh6-2, 6-4
2024-08-24vs Team SchollWon 21
W#1 DoublesJennifer Patten / Wendy Stackable vs Kimberly Wineman / Mary Varilek1-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#2 DoublesJulie Povolo / Alisia Pulella vs Jennifer Buck / Elizabeth Thomas1-6, 0-6
W#3 DoublesRenee Kaufman / JoAnn O'Connor vs Missy Fitzgerald / Lynne Tollas4-6, 6-3, 1-0
2024-08-24vs Team SteeleLost 03
L#1 DoublesLucia Elden / Barbara Newton-Tesarz vs Cynthia Fairbanks / Patricia Blewett3-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesJacqueline Ray / Janet Popper vs Mary Lee Bretz / Elizabeth Ammond4-6, 6-7
L#3 DoublesJulie Povolo / Renee Kaufman vs Theresa Stack / Diane Lindquist1-6, 6-3, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 2024 NMI Adult 55&O 7.0W
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Team Steele401027105
2Team Kaufman225716118

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.33 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.70
Jennifer Patten
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.62
Wendy Stackable
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.43
Renee Kaufman
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.37
Janet Popper
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.29
JoAnn O'Connor
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Barbara Newton-Tesarz
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.17
Lucia Elden
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.08
Jacqueline Ray
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.00
Alisia Pulella
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
Julie Povolo
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Stefee Kim
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Renee Kaufman + JoAnn O'Connor6065% gamesnot enough data
Renee Kaufman + Barbara Newton-Tesarz314 matchesnot enough data
JoAnn O'Connor + Wendy Stackable224 matchesnot enough data
Renee Kaufman + Wendy Stackable303 matchesnot enough data
Jennifer Patten + Wendy Stackable213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jennifer Patten
10W–21L career · 3 lines in 2024
7%91%2%
3.70
Wendy Stackable
17W–5L career · 3 lines in 2024
<1%20%80%
3.62
Renee Kaufman
29W–10L career · 3 lines in 2024
<1%69%31%
3.43
Janet Popper
32W–27L career · 2 lines in 2024
<1%81%18%
3.37
3.5
JoAnn O'Connor
29W–22L career · 2 lines in 2024
2%91%7%
3.29
3.5
Barbara Newton-Tesarz
15W–16L career · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data
Lucia Elden
9W–14L career · 2 lines in 2024
11%88%1%
3.17
Jacqueline Ray
1W–8L career · 2 lines in 2024
27%73%<1%
3.08
3.5
Alisia Pulella
83W–86L career · 2 lines in 2024
49%51%<1%
3.00
Julie Povolo
1W–17L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data
Stefee Kim
14W–16L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.