Teams

Team Scholl

2024 NMI Adult 55&O · 2024 NMI Adult 55&O 7.0W

10 players · average NTRP 3.50 / NORTHERN MICHIGAN

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2024-08-25vs Team KaufmanLost 12
W#1 DoublesKim Scholl / Jennifer Buck vs Jacqueline Ray / Janet Popper6-1, 6-3
L#2 DoublesDianne Litzenburger / Deborah Miller vs Jennifer Patten / Wendy Stackable3-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesLynne Tollas / Valerie Walsh vs Alisia Pulella / Barbara Newton-Tesarz2-6, 4-6
2024-08-25vs Team SteeleLost 03
L#1 DoublesKim Scholl / Jennifer Buck vs Cynthia van Maanen / Eve Elden4-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesMary Varilek / Missy Fitzgerald vs Elizabeth Ammond / Mary Lee Bretz4-6, 6-2, 0-1
L#3 DoublesValerie Walsh / Dianne Litzenburger vs Patricia Blewett / Babe Toteff3-6, 2-6
2024-08-24vs Team SteeleLost 12
L#1 DoublesKim Scholl / Elizabeth Thomas vs Eve Elden / Cynthia van Maanen4-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesJennifer Buck / Kimberly Wineman vs Debra McKeon / Babe Toteff6-2, 6-2
L#3 DoublesDeborah Miller / Tammy Labell-Peer vs Cynthia Fairbanks / Maggi Steele3-6, 3-6
2024-08-24vs Team KaufmanLost 12
L#1 DoublesKimberly Wineman / Mary Varilek vs Jennifer Patten / Wendy Stackable6-1, 4-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesJennifer Buck / Elizabeth Thomas vs Julie Povolo / Alisia Pulella6-1, 6-0
L#3 DoublesMissy Fitzgerald / Lynne Tollas vs Renee Kaufman / JoAnn O'Connor6-4, 3-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 2024 NMI Adult 55&O 7.0W
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Team Hodge000000
2Team Scholl000000

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.34 estimated across 1 rated player. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.34
Mary Varilek
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Dianne Litzenburger
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
Jennifer Buck
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Kim Scholl
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Kimberly Wineman
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Linda Gillam
published
Lynne Tollas
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Missy Fitzgerald
published
Tammy Labell-Peer
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Valerie Walsh
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jennifer Buck + Kim Scholl6256% games+2.1% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Mary Varilek
10W–8L career · 2 lines in 2024
<1%88%11%
3.34
3.5
Dianne Litzenburger
20W–14L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data
Jennifer Buck
20W–17L career · 4 lines in 2024
not enough data
Kim Scholl
29W–9L career · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data
Kimberly Wineman
17W–6L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data
Linda Gillam
3W–14L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Lynne Tollas
12W–13L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data
Missy Fitzgerald
15W–9L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Tammy Labell-Peer
3W–3L career · 1 line in 2024
not enough data
Valerie Walsh
11W–3L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.