Teams

JRanheim-ENO

2025 Eno River Singles 40 & Over · 40 & Over Singles 3.0 Women Evening

6 players · average NTRP 3.00 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-06-26vs MMacdonald-HSLost 12
L#1 SinglesEdith Becerra vs Peggi Hunter0-6, 4-6
L#2 SinglesJamie Scaglione vs Tynita Edwards6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W#3 SinglesJanet Ranheim vs Jennifer Draughon6-3, 6-3
2025-06-19vs MFulton-UNCSplit 11
L#2 SinglesPamela Howell-Davis vs Laura Dean4-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#3 SinglesEdith Becerra vs Maggie Cao1-6, 6-4, 1-0
2025-06-17vs SBartle-ENOWon 30
W#1 SinglesEdith Becerra vs Liz Schaller6-4, 2-6, 1-0
W#2 SinglesJean Cormier vs Susanne Schmal6-1, 3-0
W#3 SinglesPamela Howell-Davis vs Shannon Bartle6-7, 6-3, 1-0
2025-06-12vs KMcWhorter-HVCCLost 02
L#1 SinglesKim Hutter vs Andrew Moon0-6, 0-6
L#3 SinglesJanet Ranheim vs Betsy Euler4-6, 3-6
2025-05-29vs ETurner-HRWon 20
W#2 SinglesKim Hutter vs Cheryl Bock6-3, 4-6, 1-0
W#3 SinglesJean Cormier vs Athena Samaras6-0, 6-1
2025-05-22vs TCrowley-CHTCLost 02
L#2 SinglesJanet Ranheim vs Tracy Crowley2-6, 1-6
L#3 SinglesPamela Howell-Davis vs Mary Griffiths6-4, 1-6, 0-1
2025-05-15vs LKulp-ENOWon 21
L#1 SinglesJamie Scaglione vs Liza Terll2-6, 1-6
W#2 SinglesPamela Howell-Davis vs Lori Salzmann3-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#3 SinglesKim Hutter vs Katy McReynolds6-2, 7-5
2025-05-08vs TPrinstein-HRWon 21
L#1 SinglesJean Cormier vs Kim Cabelka6-7, 3-6
W#2 SinglesEdith Becerra vs Eniko Nagy6-1, 6-4
W#3 SinglesJamie Scaglione vs Constanza de Radcliffe6-2, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 40 & Over Singles 3.0 Women Evening have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.74 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.83
Kim Hutter
usually #3 Singles 33%, also #2 Singles 33% · published 3
2.79
Edith Becerra
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 25% · published 3
2.75
Janet Ranheim
usually #3 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published 3
2.74
Jamie Scaglione
usually #3 Singles 33%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 3
2.71
Jean Cormier
usually #1 Singles 33%, also #3 Singles 33% · published 3
2.59
Pamela Howell-Davis
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #3 Singles 50% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Pamela Howell-Davis + Jean Cormier3245% gamesnot enough data
Pamela Howell-Davis + Janet Ranheim314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Kim Hutter
32W–28L career · 3 lines in 2025
1%90%9%
2.83
3
Edith Becerra
35W–27L career · 4 lines in 2025
1%93%5%
2.79
3
Janet Ranheim
108W–114L career · 3 lines in 2025
3%95%3%
2.75
3
Jamie Scaglione
27W–61L career · 3 lines in 2025
3%95%2%
2.74
3
Jean Cormier
51W–49L career · 3 lines in 2025
5%94%1%
2.71
3
Pamela Howell-Davis
120W–146L career · 4 lines in 2025
25%75%<1%
2.59

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.