Teams

LEBTC BLUE

2022 USTA ADULT 40 & OVER - DEN · WOMEN 3.0 - 40 & OVER

10 players · average NTRP 2.75 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2022-07-19vs KC GOLDSplit 22
L#1 DoublesLorraine Devens / Julie Greco vs Vicki Sullivan / Kim Sandman4-6, 5-7
W#1 SinglesAmy Hansel vs Allison Rooney5-7, 6-4, 1-0
L#2 DoublesMary LePino Butler / Amee Auberry vs Amanda Mueller / Peggy Cooper4-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesAlice Heerse / Tari Gold vs Jennifer Schum / Allison Coquet7-6, 6-3
2022-07-12vs CK BLUELost 13
W#1 DoublesAmee Auberry / Kristi Snow vs Susan OBrien / Jeni Cuddie7-6, 6-4
L#1 SinglesJulie Greco vs Melanie Powell3-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesAlice Heerse / Tari Gold vs Christine Angelini / Carissa Hollander3-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesMary LePino Butler / Cindy McFadden vs Lisa Fellows / Erika Thomas2-6, 6-3, 0-1
2022-07-05vs LEBTC YELLOWLost 13
L#1 DoublesKristi Snow / Cindy McFadden vs Robyn Jensen / Bethana Kuchenbecker4-6, 4-6
L#1 SinglesAmy Hansel vs Kimberlee Harmon7-6, 1-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesJulie Greco / Tari Gold vs Deborah Jenson / Davinia Lyon6-2, 6-3
L#3 DoublesAlice Heerse / Mary LePino Butler vs Monica Panczer / Alisa Sajadi0-6, 0-6
2022-06-28vs BM REDSplit 22
L#1 DoublesTari Gold / Kristi Snow vs Adrienne Bivens / Kimberly Picchietti1-6, 6-2, 0-1
L#1 SinglesAmy Hansel vs Heather Mitchell6-7, 1-6
W#2 DoublesLorraine Devens / Amee Auberry vs Neha Sitole / Beth Hoffman6-2, 6-2
W#3 DoublesCindy McFadden / Maggie Bronson vs Rhonda Milligan / Theresa Fry6-0, 6-1
2022-06-21vs KC BLUEWon 40
W#1 DoublesKristi Snow / Cindy McFadden vs Gail Heitland / Kristen Hoffman4-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#1 SinglesJulie Greco vs Ashley Campsie6-2, 6-3
W#2 DoublesLorraine Devens / Amee Auberry vs Kathryn Tobey / Robin Vint7-6, 6-3
W#3 DoublesAlice Heerse / Maggie Bronson vs Maria Wilson / Nathalia Urbano6-1, 6-4
2022-06-14vs SSHP REDLost 04
L#1 DoublesAlice Heerse / Kristi Snow vs Elizabeth Whittaker / Tonya Berry4-6, 4-6
L#1 SinglesAmy Hansel vs Lindsey Sittko6-4, 4-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesLorraine Devens / Amee Auberry vs Brooke Wagner / Amy Noverr2-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesMary LePino Butler / Maggie Bronson vs Kate Perreault / Nicole Poulos3-6, 3-6
2022-06-07vs PH BLUEWon 21
W#1 DoublesCindy McFadden / Tari Gold vs Tara Wolfe / Christina Lawson6-3, 3-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesAmy Hansel vs Margo Livadariu4-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesLorraine Devens / Amee Auberry vs Teri Markle / Heather la Montagne7-5, 1-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 3.0 - 40 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.88 estimated across 1 rated player. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.88
Amee Auberry
usually #2 Doubles 83%, also #1 Doubles 17% · published 3
Cindy McFadden
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 3
Alice Heerse
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 2.5
Amy Hansel
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 2.5
Julie Greco
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
Kristi Snow
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Lorraine Devens
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published
Maggie Bronson
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Mary LePino Butler
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Tari Gold
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Cindy McFadden + Julie Greco4350% games+6.0% vs expected
Lorraine Devens + Julie Greco2550% games+4.5% vs expected
Cindy McFadden + Kristi Snow12453% games+2.3% vs expected
Maggie Bronson + Mary LePino Butler1441% games−0.1% vs expected
Maggie Bronson + Alice Heerse3440% games−3.9% vs expected
Cindy McFadden + Mary LePino Butler2635% games−6.2% vs expected
Alice Heerse + Mary LePino Butler21031% games−9.8% vs expected
Cindy McFadden + Lorraine Devens134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Amee Auberry
61W–43L career · 6 lines in 2022
<1%82%18%
2.88
3
Cindy McFadden
22W–21L career · 5 lines in 2022
not enough data
2.5
Alice Heerse
12W–34L career · 5 lines in 2022
not enough data
2.5
Amy Hansel
14W–28L career · 5 lines in 2022
not enough data
Julie Greco
20W–19L career · 4 lines in 2022
not enough data
Kristi Snow
18W–9L career · 5 lines in 2022
not enough data
Lorraine Devens
6W–14L career · 5 lines in 2022
not enough data
Maggie Bronson
10W–14L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data
Mary LePino Butler
6W–30L career · 4 lines in 2022
not enough data
Tari Gold
24W–34L career · 5 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.