Teams

SSHP RED

2022 USTA ADULT 40 & OVER - DEN · WOMEN 3.0 - 40 & OVER

11 players · average NTRP 3.25 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2022-07-19vs BM REDWon 40
W#1 DoublesNicole Poulos / Tonya Mazurek vs Sarah Wadsworth / Adrienne Bivens6-4, 6-4
W#1 SinglesLindsey Sittko vs N/A6-0, 6-0
W#2 DoublesGabriela Cerny / Elizabeth Whittaker vs Lisa Brinker / Kimberly Picchietti6-1, 6-3
W#3 DoublesCherie Mitchell / Karen Keehan Odendahl vs Beth Hoffman / Rhonda Milligan6-1, 6-2
2022-07-12vs PH BLUESplit 22
L#1 DoublesAmy Noverr / Lindsey Sittko vs Prairie Robinson / Margo Livadariu6-0, 6-7, 0-1
L#1 SinglesElizabeth Whittaker vs Tracy Wells4-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesTonya Berry / Nicole Poulos vs Amy Attwood / Tara Wolfe6-0, 6-3
W#3 DoublesGabriela Cerny / Kate Perreault vs Ann Gallagher / Christina Lawson6-2, 6-0
2022-07-05vs KC GOLDWon 31
W#1 DoublesBrooke Wagner / Lindsey Sittko vs Vicki Sullivan / Elizabeth Baesman6-4, 6-0
W#1 SinglesAmy Noverr vs Kim Sandman6-2, 6-4
W#2 DoublesTonya Mazurek / Tonya Berry vs Kim Barry / Alicia Pucci7-6, 6-1
L#3 DoublesKate Perreault / Nicole Poulos vs Amanda Mueller / Peggy Cooper7-6, 5-7, 1-0
2022-06-28vs CK BLUEWon 21
W#1 DoublesBrooke Wagner / Lindsey Sittko vs Susan OBrien / Bibi Kearney6-3, 6-2
W#2 DoublesGabriela Cerny / Tonya Berry vs Christine Angelini / Carissa Hollander6-2, 5-7, 1-0
L#3 DoublesKaren Keehan Odendahl / Cherie Mitchell vs Lara McCormick / Melanie Powell4-6, 2-6
2022-06-21vs LEBTC YELLOWLost 13
L#1 DoublesAmy Noverr / Brooke Wagner vs Davinia Lyon / Deborah Jenson3-6, 7-6, 0-1
L#1 SinglesTonya Mazurek vs Bethana Kuchenbecker0-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesTonya Berry / Elizabeth Whittaker vs Mary Clare Hainsworth / Lynne Monnar6-4, 6-4
L#3 DoublesNicole Poulos / Cherie Mitchell vs Monica Panczer / Alisa Sajadi2-6, 2-6
2022-06-14vs LEBTC BLUEWon 40
W#1 DoublesElizabeth Whittaker / Tonya Berry vs Alice Heerse / Kristi Snow6-4, 6-4
W#1 SinglesLindsey Sittko vs Amy Hansel4-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#2 DoublesBrooke Wagner / Amy Noverr vs Lorraine Devens / Amee Auberry6-2, 6-3
W#3 DoublesKate Perreault / Nicole Poulos vs Mary LePino Butler / Maggie Bronson6-3, 6-3
2022-06-07vs KC BLUEWon 31
L#1 DoublesKate Perreault / Lindsey Sittko vs Ashley Campsie / Kristen Hoffman5-7, 6-7
W#1 SinglesBrooke Wagner vs Nathalia Urbano6-4, 6-4
W#2 DoublesTonya Mazurek / Tonya Berry vs Kathryn Tobey / Carolyn Wachuta6-3, 6-0
W#3 DoublesKaren Keehan Odendahl / Cherie Mitchell vs Cheryl Amador / Elizabeth Rao6-1, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 3.0 - 40 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.96 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.55
Brooke Wagner
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #1 Singles 20% · published 4
3.19
Elizabeth Whittaker
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 25% · published 3.5
3.15
Gabriela Cerny
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.10
Tonya Berry
usually #2 Doubles 83%, also #1 Doubles 17% · published
2.85
Nicole Poulos
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3
2.84
Lindsey Sittko
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 3
2.83
Amy Noverr
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.75
Cherie Mitchell
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.70
Karen Keehan Odendahl
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.66
Kate Perreault
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
Tonya Mazurek
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 25% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Amy Noverr + Kate Perreault6065% games+12.9% vs expected
Nicole Poulos + Tonya Berry9071% games+11.9% vs expected
Lindsey Sittko + Gabriela Cerny5069% games+11.1% vs expected
Amy Noverr + Brooke Wagner12554% games+9.2% vs expected
Gabriela Cerny + Kate Perreault9173% games+7.4% vs expected
Tonya Berry + Elizabeth Whittaker6163% games+6.6% vs expected
Gabriela Cerny + Tonya Berry8362% games+6.3% vs expected
Nicole Poulos + Elizabeth Whittaker4161% games+5.0% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Brooke Wagner
180W–105L career · 5 lines in 2022
36%64%<1%
3.55
3.5
Elizabeth Whittaker
36W–22L career · 4 lines in 2022
8%91%1%
3.19
3.5
Gabriela Cerny
72W–44L career · 3 lines in 2022
13%87%<1%
3.15
Tonya Berry
49W–22L career · 6 lines in 2022
23%77%<1%
3.10
3
Nicole Poulos
91W–55L career · 5 lines in 2022
<1%87%13%
2.85
3
Lindsey Sittko
71W–33L career · 6 lines in 2022
<1%89%10%
2.84
3
Amy Noverr
109W–49L career · 4 lines in 2022
1%90%9%
2.83
3
Cherie Mitchell
47W–35L career · 4 lines in 2022
3%95%3%
2.75
3
Karen Keehan Odendahl
76W–47L career · 3 lines in 2022
6%93%1%
2.70
Kate Perreault
40W–26L career · 4 lines in 2022
11%88%<1%
2.66
Tonya Mazurek
34W–24L career · 4 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.