Teams

KC GOLD

2022 USTA ADULT 40 & OVER - DEN · WOMEN 3.0 - 40 & OVER

11 players · average NTRP 3.06 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2022-07-19vs LEBTC BLUESplit 22
W#1 DoublesVicki Sullivan / Kim Sandman vs Lorraine Devens / Julie Greco6-4, 7-5
L#1 SinglesAllison Rooney vs Amy Hansel7-5, 4-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesAmanda Mueller / Peggy Cooper vs Mary LePino Butler / Amee Auberry6-4, 6-4
L#3 DoublesJennifer Schum / Allison Coquet vs Alice Heerse / Tari Gold6-7, 3-6
2022-07-12vs KC BLUEWon 40
W#1 DoublesAllison Rooney / Peggy Cooper vs Kristen Hoffman / Ashley Campsie7-5, 4-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesRebecca Handley vs Nathalia Urbano6-1, 6-2
W#2 DoublesAmanda Mueller / Kim Sandman vs Cheryl Amador / Gina Schulz7-6, 6-2
W#3 DoublesKim Barry / Alicia Pucci vs Robin Vint / Elizabeth Rao6-1, 6-2
2022-07-05vs SSHP REDLost 13
L#1 DoublesVicki Sullivan / Elizabeth Baesman vs Brooke Wagner / Lindsey Sittko4-6, 0-6
L#1 SinglesKim Sandman vs Amy Noverr2-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesKim Barry / Alicia Pucci vs Tonya Mazurek / Tonya Berry6-7, 1-6
W#3 DoublesAmanda Mueller / Peggy Cooper vs Kate Perreault / Nicole Poulos7-6, 5-7, 1-0
2022-06-28vs PH BLUEWon 31
W#1 DoublesAllison Rooney / Peggy Cooper vs Christina Lawson / Ann Gallagher6-2, 6-3
L#1 SinglesRebecca Handley vs Tracy Wells3-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesVicki Sullivan / Elizabeth Baesman vs Teri Markle / Bobbie Mantey6-2, 6-3
W#3 DoublesKim Barry / Alicia Pucci vs Amy Attwood / Heather la Montagne6-4, 5-7, 1-0
2022-06-21vs BM REDWon 31
W#1 DoublesAlicia Pucci / Kim Barry vs Sarah Wadsworth / Jill Rakowski6-4, 2-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesKim Sandman vs Heather Mitchell4-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#2 DoublesElizabeth Baesman / Amanda Mueller vs Adrienne Bivens / Lisa Brinker4-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesAllison Rooney / Peggy Cooper vs Molly Blake / Theresa Fry6-0, 6-3
2022-06-14vs CK BLUEWon 40
W#1 DoublesVicki Sullivan / Elizabeth Baesman vs Erika Thomas / Lynette Hosler7-5, 6-4
W#1 SinglesRebecca Handley vs Melanie Powell6-3, 6-1
W#2 DoublesKim Barry / Allison Rooney vs Cathy McFarland / Jeni Cuddie7-6, 6-4
W#3 DoublesKim Sandman / Alicia Pucci vs Lara McCormick / Bibi Kearney6-0, 6-0
2022-06-07vs LEBTC YELLOWSplit 22
L#1 DoublesJennifer Schum / Allison Rooney vs Davinia Lyon / Monica Panczer3-6, 4-6
W#1 SinglesRebecca Handley vs Lynne Monnar7-5, 6-2
L#2 DoublesAllison Coquet / Vicki Sullivan vs Bethana Kuchenbecker / Janee Wren7-5, 2-2
W#3 DoublesKim Barry / Kim Sandman vs Robyn Jensen / Alisa Sajadi6-4, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 3.0 - 40 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.94 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.38
Rebecca Handley
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3.5
3.29
Peggy Cooper
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
3.13
Allison Coquet
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.09
Amanda Mueller
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.92
Elizabeth Baesman
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.82
Allison Rooney
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 17% · published 3
2.81
Kim Barry
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.78
Kim Sandman
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 3
2.74
Vicki Sullivan
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.47
Alicia Pucci
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 2.5
Jennifer Schum
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Vicki Sullivan + Allison Coquet3455% games+9.7% vs expected
Peggy Cooper + Allison Rooney19560% games+9.2% vs expected
Jennifer Schum + Kim Barry5256% games+5.8% vs expected
Alicia Pucci + Kim Barry5254% games+3.5% vs expected
Vicki Sullivan + Jennifer Schum7752% games+3.0% vs expected
Jennifer Schum + Allison Coquet4353% games+2.8% vs expected
Elizabeth Baesman + Amanda Mueller4451% games+1.3% vs expected
Kim Sandman + Allison Rooney3352% games+0.1% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Rebecca Handley
76W–28L career · 4 lines in 2022
<1%82%17%
3.38
Peggy Cooper
58W–25L career · 5 lines in 2022
1%93%6%
3.29
3.5
Allison Coquet
93W–59L career · type A · 2 lines in 2022
17%83%<1%
3.13
3
Amanda Mueller
33W–40L career · 4 lines in 2022
<1%24%76%
3.09
3
Elizabeth Baesman
121W–122L career · 4 lines in 2022
<1%73%27%
2.92
3
Allison Rooney
51W–32L career · 6 lines in 2022
1%91%8%
2.82
Kim Barry
39W–22L career · 6 lines in 2022
1%92%7%
2.81
3
Kim Sandman
34W–28L career · 6 lines in 2022
1%94%5%
2.78
3
Vicki Sullivan
63W–70L career · 5 lines in 2022
3%95%2%
2.74
2.5
Alicia Pucci
58W–49L career · 5 lines in 2022
0%59%41%
2.47
Jennifer Schum
35W–32L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.