Teams

CAUGHLIN 18AW4.0A

2024 ADULT 18&Over · Women's 4.0

17 players · average NTRP 4.00 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for Women's 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.65 estimated across 15 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.00
Jennifer Pereos
published
3.93
3.82
Dawn Schlagel
published 4
3.81
Amy Engelbert
published 4
3.78
Darcie Watson
published 4
3.76
Amy Gunderson
published 4
Amy Gao
published 4
3.72
Dawn Allen
published 4
3.64
Marci Banes
published
3.62
Natalie Dejan
published
3.59
Jenny Weisberg
published
3.51
Victoria Ness
published
3.48
3.44
Sandra Laskey
published
3.38
Remy Bernarda
published
3.23
Suzanne Hodnick
published
Shelli Tiller
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Dawn Schlagel + Amy Engelbert404 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jennifer Pereos
44W–9L career · no lines in 2024
<1%49%51%
4.00
4
Christine Brenner
5W–0L career · no lines in 2024
<1%70%30%
3.93
4
Dawn Schlagel
18W–7L career · no lines in 2024
1%89%10%
3.82
4
Amy Engelbert
9W–5L career · no lines in 2024
1%89%9%
3.81
4
Darcie Watson
3W–1L career · no lines in 2024
2%92%6%
3.78
4
Amy Gunderson
4W–6L career · no lines in 2024
3%92%4%
3.76
4
Amy Gao
0W–1L career · type S · no lines in 2024
not enough data
4
Dawn Allen
4W–16L career · no lines in 2024
6%92%2%
3.72
Marci Banes
5W–5L career · no lines in 2024
16%83%<1%
3.64
Natalie Dejan
2W–1L career · no lines in 2024
19%81%<1%
3.62
Jenny Weisberg
3W–4L career · no lines in 2024
26%74%<1%
3.59
Victoria Ness
14W–11L career · no lines in 2024
<1%47%53%
3.51
Dorthe Skov Johnston
2W–2L career · no lines in 2024
57%43%<1%
3.48
Sandra Laskey
20W–4L career · no lines in 2024
<1%67%33%
3.44
Remy Bernarda
4W–6L career · no lines in 2024
<1%79%21%
3.38
Suzanne Hodnick
9W–8L career · no lines in 2024
5%92%3%
3.23
Shelli Tiller
1W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.