Teams

Gooden/Jones/Nashville

2022 Tri-Level 18 & Over - Nashville · 4.0, 3.5, 3.0 Women - Monday AM

15 players · average NTRP 3.75 / TENNESSEE

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for 4.0, 3.5, 3.0 Women - Monday AM have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.33 estimated across 15 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.73
Diana Buss
published 4
3.71
Rachel Horres
published
3.65
Brenda Eckhart
published 4
3.52
Sally Major
published
3.46
Shari Glickman
published
3.46
Traci Holton
published
3.44
Jennifer Knight
published
3.32
Nona Camposano
published
3.23
Leena Choi
published
3.19
Kacey Passmore
published
3.17
Jenny Neeley
published
3.10
Angelique Hopper
published 3.5
3.09
Carol Stansbury
published 3.5
3.02
Susan Higgins
published
2.80
Sherri Jones
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Shari Glickman + Traci Holton11561% games+12.8% vs expected
Jennifer Knight + Brenda Eckhart24861% games+9.3% vs expected
Diana Buss + Shari Glickman224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Diana Buss
6W–8L career · no lines in 2022
4%94%2%
3.73
Rachel Horres
9W–5L career · no lines in 2022
5%93%1%
3.71
4
Brenda Eckhart
33W–10L career · no lines in 2022
12%87%<1%
3.65
Sally Major
8W–11L career · no lines in 2022
43%57%<1%
3.52
Shari Glickman
65W–49L career · no lines in 2022
<1%61%39%
3.46
Traci Holton
23W–17L career · no lines in 2022
<1%64%36%
3.46
Jennifer Knight
35W–11L career · no lines in 2022
<1%69%31%
3.44
Nona Camposano
1W–2L career · no lines in 2022
1%91%9%
3.32
Leena Choi
16W–19L career · no lines in 2022
4%94%2%
3.23
Kacey Passmore
11W–13L career · no lines in 2022
7%92%1%
3.19
Jenny Neeley
28W–30L career · no lines in 2022
10%90%1%
3.17
3.5
Angelique Hopper
19W–13L career · no lines in 2022
23%77%<1%
3.10
3.5
Carol Stansbury
3W–6L career · no lines in 2022
25%75%<1%
3.09
Susan Higgins
1W–3L career · no lines in 2022
45%55%<1%
3.02
Sherri Jones
18W–17L career · no lines in 2022
1%93%6%
2.80

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.