Teams

CDTA S 55&OW8.0 b.MT Bann(OUT) Greeley Thur 6:30 $25

CDTA Summer Adult 55 & Over · CDTA S 55 & Over Women 8.0

16 players · average NTRP 3.69 / CHICAGO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
L#1 DoublesJulie Alexander / Rosemary Wheeler vs Patricia Jablonski / Sally Berry1-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesChristina Greeley / Rachel Kaiser vs Beverly Barbush / Gail Harowski2-6, 3-6
W#1 DoublesChristina Greeley / Cara Waddle vs Cathy Evangelist / Janice McKane6-3, 6-1
L#2 DoublesRosa Hugener / Julie Alexander vs Joanne Krug / Anne Zanella-Gleason0-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesRochelle Meng / Cheryl Ingram vs Beth Immen / Zagorka James4-6, 2-6
W#1 DoublesKristine Blaser / Rochelle Meng vs Julie Colhoun / Fran Wiechart6-3, 6-4
L#2 DoublesJulie Alexander / Tory Jarvis vs Kate Newman / Maria Lobo-Corey6-7, 1-2
L#3 DoublesRachel Kaiser / Rosa Hugener vs Noreen Ohcana / Gail Wilson1-6, 2-6
L#1 DoublesPatti Charman / Rosemary Wheeler vs Patricia Behnke / Donna Matkovic1-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesTory Jarvis / Rochelle Meng vs Raquel Karpinski / Stephanie Batka2-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesLisa Rosen / Elisa Zusman vs Margo Carvell / Nancy Maska6-4, 6-1
L#1 DoublesPam Fisher / Tory Jarvis vs Gayle Dominicis / Hoda Elshakankery4-6, 5-6
L#2 DoublesRosemary Wheeler / Kristine Blaser vs Mimi Paffrath / Cheryl Watkins6-1, 4-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesElisa Zusman / Lisa Rosen vs Kelly O'Donnell / Silvia Kusaka7-6, 4-3
W#1 DoublesRochelle Meng / Cheryl Ingram vs Mary McNamara / Joan Vander Linde6-0, 6-2
W#2 DoublesJulie Alexander / Elisa Zusman vs Rosa Abreu / Colleen Roberts6-1, 7-6
W#3 DoublesChristina Greeley / Laurie Sandman vs N/A6-0, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings7 teams · CDTA S 55 & Over Women 8.0
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1CDTA S 55&OW8.0 c.Schaumburg Eisner Sun 10 $206014412136
2CDTA S 55&OW8.0 e.Park Forest Harowski Mon 7 $155112617149
3CDTA S 55&OW8.0 d.Centre Court Karpinski Thur 7 $2339920154
4CDTA S 55&OW8.0 f.Tam Corey Mon 7 $223381021151
5CDTA S 55&OW8.0 a.Northbrook Lloyd Thur 7 $24249922175
6CDTA S 55&OW8.0 b.MT Bann(OUT) Greeley Thur 6:30 $251571122159
7CDTA S 55&OW8.0 g.Oak Park(OUT) Roberts Sun 2 $121541430203

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.45 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.94
Cara Waddle
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.61
Rochelle Meng
usually #3 Doubles 57%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published 4
3.60
Pam Fisher
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.56
Rachel Kaiser
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.46
Linda Meyer
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.41
Cheryl Ingram
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.39
Christina Greeley
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.32
Laurie Sandman
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.29
Rosemary Wheeler
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.23
Rosa Hugener
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.20
Elisa Zusman
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 38% · published 3.5
Julie Alexander
published
Kristine Blaser
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Lisa Rosen
published
Patti Charman
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Tory Jarvis
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Rachel Kaiser + Rochelle Meng6749% games+17.8% vs expected
Elisa Zusman + Laurie Sandman9560% games+10.3% vs expected
Elisa Zusman + Christina Greeley3255% games+10.1% vs expected
Laurie Sandman + Linda Meyer7158% games+9.5% vs expected
Christina Greeley + Cheryl Ingram271157% games+8.2% vs expected
Rachel Kaiser + Christina Greeley8158% games+5.4% vs expected
Tory Jarvis + Rochelle Meng8849% games+3.5% vs expected
Pam Fisher + Rochelle Meng9258% games+1.7% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Cara Waddle
162W–117L career · 1 line in 2023
<1%68%32%
3.94
4
Rochelle Meng
184W–198L career · 7 lines in 2023
20%80%<1%
3.61
4
Pam Fisher
88W–71L career · 1 line in 2023
22%78%<1%
3.60
Rachel Kaiser
45W–45L career · 2 lines in 2023
32%67%<1%
3.56
Linda Meyer
130W–84L career · 3 lines in 2023
<1%63%37%
3.46
3.5
Cheryl Ingram
116W–69L career · 5 lines in 2023
<1%76%24%
3.41
3.5
Christina Greeley
226W–208L career · 5 lines in 2023
<1%79%21%
3.39
3.5
Laurie Sandman
158W–135L career · 4 lines in 2023
1%91%8%
3.32
3.5
Rosemary Wheeler
162W–147L career · 3 lines in 2023
1%93%5%
3.29
Rosa Hugener
35W–67L career · 2 lines in 2023
4%94%2%
3.23
3.5
Elisa Zusman
172W–142L career · 8 lines in 2023
6%93%1%
3.20
Julie Alexander
45W–56L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Kristine Blaser
30W–20L career · 1 line in 2023
not enough data
Lisa Rosen
9W–15L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Patti Charman
33W–43L career · 1 line in 2023
not enough data
Tory Jarvis
27W–31L career · 3 lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.