Teams

CDTA S 55&OW8.0 d.Centre Court Karpinski Thur 7 $2

CDTA Summer Adult 55 & Over · CDTA S 55 & Over Women 8.0

13 players · average NTRP 3.77 / CHICAGO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
L#1 DoublesMiriam Abe / Donna Matkovic vs Zagorka James / Terri Whiting3-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#2 DoublesKathy Kasiurak / Irene Powers vs Terra Jahns / Lori Saguto0-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesRaquel Karpinski / Barbara Lee-Budin vs Erica Eisner / Joanne Krug6-3, 2-4, 1-0
L#1 DoublesPatricia Behnke / Kathy Kasiurak vs Julie Sujack / Deborah Poe4-6, 6-0, 0-1
W#2 DoublesDonna Matkovic / Irene Powers vs Jeanne Gallo / Colleen Roberts6-1, 6-0
W#3 DoublesAnn Wiet / Julie Pawula vs Mary McNamara / Joan Vander Linde6-2, 6-2
W#1 DoublesPatricia Behnke / Donna Matkovic vs Patti Charman / Rosemary Wheeler6-1, 6-2
W#2 DoublesRaquel Karpinski / Stephanie Batka vs Tory Jarvis / Rochelle Meng6-2, 6-3
L#3 DoublesMargo Carvell / Nancy Maska vs Lisa Rosen / Elisa Zusman4-6, 1-6
L#1 DoublesRaquel Karpinski / Stephanie Batka vs Sara Marberry / Carolyn Sitkiewicz3-6, 6-7
W#2 DoublesPatricia Behnke / Donna Matkovic vs Gayle Dominicis / Debra Brambora7-5, 6-3
W#3 DoublesMargo Carvell / Irene Powers vs Mary Etherington / Roseann Solak6-2, 2-6, 1-0
W#1 DoublesStephanie Batka / Raquel Karpinski vs Maria Lobo-Corey / Julie Weidner6-2, 6-2
L#2 DoublesAnn Wiet / Kathy Kasiurak vs Tina Kayne / Diedre Dunn0-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesJulie Pawula / Lisa Sanderson vs Noreen Ohcana / Laura Purcell4-6, 0-6
W#1 DoublesStephanie Batka / Miriam Abe vs Caren Swickard / Lorie Cook7-6, 6-3
L#2 DoublesRaquel Karpinski / Patricia Behnke vs Sally Berry / April Cafmeyer7-6, 5-7, 0-1
L#3 DoublesMargo Carvell / Nancy Maska vs Cari Anderson / Amy Peick2-6, 7-5, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings7 teams · CDTA S 55 & Over Women 8.0
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1CDTA S 55&OW8.0 c.Schaumburg Eisner Sun 10 $206014412136
2CDTA S 55&OW8.0 e.Park Forest Harowski Mon 7 $155112617149
3CDTA S 55&OW8.0 d.Centre Court Karpinski Thur 7 $2339920154
4CDTA S 55&OW8.0 f.Tam Corey Mon 7 $223381021151
5CDTA S 55&OW8.0 a.Northbrook Lloyd Thur 7 $24249922175
6CDTA S 55&OW8.0 b.MT Bann(OUT) Greeley Thur 6:30 $251571122159
7CDTA S 55&OW8.0 g.Oak Park(OUT) Roberts Sun 2 $121541430203

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.54 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.92
Donna Matkovic
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.88
Stephanie Batka
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.79
Miriam Abe
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.72
Patricia Behnke
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.65
Margo Carvell
usually #1 Doubles 56%, also #2 Doubles 22% · published 3.5
3.63
Raquel Karpinski
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.60
Barbara Lee-Budin
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.52
Irene Powers
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.42
Kathy Kasiurak
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.42
Nancy Maska
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.23
Ann Wiet
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.16
Julie Pawula
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published 3.5
3.12
Lisa Sanderson
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Raquel Karpinski + Miriam Abe6657% games+8.4% vs expected
Donna Matkovic + Raquel Karpinski11755% games+7.0% vs expected
Donna Matkovic + Stephanie Batka14854% games+6.7% vs expected
Stephanie Batka + Patricia Behnke8556% games+3.5% vs expected
Stephanie Batka + Raquel Karpinski91451% games+2.2% vs expected
Stephanie Batka + Miriam Abe9554% games+0.3% vs expected
Donna Matkovic + Miriam Abe1447% games−0.5% vs expected
Raquel Karpinski + Patricia Behnke81945% games−4.0% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Donna Matkovic
167W–127L career · 4 lines in 2023
<1%72%28%
3.92
4
Stephanie Batka
329W–235L career · 9 lines in 2023
<1%81%19%
3.88
Miriam Abe
64W–57L career · 2 lines in 2023
1%94%5%
3.79
4
Patricia Behnke
103W–89L career · 4 lines in 2023
5%94%2%
3.72
3.5
Margo Carvell
139W–96L career · 9 lines in 2023
<1%13%87%
3.65
4
Raquel Karpinski
83W–105L career · 5 lines in 2023
16%83%<1%
3.63
4
Barbara Lee-Budin
10W–24L career · 1 line in 2023
22%78%<1%
3.60
4
Irene Powers
32W–41L career · 3 lines in 2023
44%56%<1%
3.52
3.5
Kathy Kasiurak
113W–82L career · 3 lines in 2023
<1%74%26%
3.42
3.5
Nancy Maska
52W–89L career · 2 lines in 2023
<1%74%26%
3.42
3.5
Ann Wiet
102W–97L career · 2 lines in 2023
4%94%2%
3.23
3.5
Julie Pawula
73W–120L career · 7 lines in 2023
11%89%<1%
3.16
Lisa Sanderson
14W–41L career · 1 line in 2023
18%82%<1%
3.12

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.