Teams

5 ACAC Dennis

2025 Richmond Singles · Richmond Singles 3.5 Men

7 players · average NTRP 3.62 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-11-03vs 6 Chestnut Oaks 2.0 - CargiuloWon 10
W#2 SinglesJohn Delisio vs Sam Berg6-2, 6-1
W#1 SinglesAnthony Forgey vs Srdjan Rakic6-1, 6-0
W#2 SinglesDarren Golden vs Jim Swisher6-1, 6-4
W#3 SinglesRyland Dennis vs Billy Walter6-0, 6-0
2025-10-22vs 14 WOCC 3.5 Singles - MullinaxLost 12
L#1 SinglesDarrell Eakes vs Philip Strunk1-6, 6-2, 0-1
L#2 SinglesKurt Shores vs Mark Simonton2-6, 4-6
W#3 SinglesEddie Kim vs Ivan Mullinax6-1, 6-0
2025-10-13vs 13 Avalon Singlets - BeldingWon 21
L#1 SinglesRyland Dennis vs Brent Belding4-6, 2-6
W#2 SinglesAnthony Forgey vs Todd Milligan2-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#3 SinglesDarren Golden vs Richard Stowers1-6, 7-5, 1-0
2025-10-10vs 9 Raintree PrestiaWon 21
W#1 SinglesAnthony Forgey vs Anthony Hayden6-1, 6-0
L#2 SinglesDarren Golden vs Victor Tubungbanua3-6, 2-6
W#3 SinglesKurt Shores vs David Blankley1-2
2025-10-06Lost 01
L#3 SinglesJohn Delisio vs John Ward1-6, 6-2, 1-0
2025-09-23Won 10
W#3 SinglesJohn Delisio vs David King6-1, 6-4
2025-09-22vs 7 ACAC ChandlerWon 21
W#1 SinglesAnthony Forgey vs Irvin Banks6-4, 6-0
L#2 SinglesDarren Golden vs John Jones4-6, 7-6, 1-0
W#3 SinglesKurt Shores vs Alexander Smith4-6, 6-3, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Richmond Singles 3.5 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.43 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.77
Anthony Forgey
usually #1 Singles 75%, also #2 Singles 25% · published 4
3.68
Eddie Kim
usually #3 Singles 100% · published
3.49
Ryland Dennis
usually #3 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published
3.31
Darren Golden
usually #2 Singles 75%, also #3 Singles 25% · published 3.5
3.31
Darrell Eakes
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3.5
3.25
John Delisio
usually #3 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published 3.5
3.22
Kurt Shores
usually #3 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

John Delisio + Eddie Kim404 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Anthony Forgey
33W–13L career · type A · 4 lines in 2025
3%92%5%
3.77
Eddie Kim
30W–8L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%10%90%
3.68
Ryland Dennis
15W–11L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%52%48%
3.49
3.5
Darren Golden
15W–9L career · 4 lines in 2025
1%90%9%
3.31
3.5
Darrell Eakes
10W–11L career · 1 line in 2025
1%90%8%
3.31
3.5
John Delisio
178W–167L career · 3 lines in 2025
4%93%3%
3.25
Kurt Shores
14W–14L career · 3 lines in 2025
6%92%2%
3.22

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.