Teams

13 Avalon Singlets - Belding

2025 Richmond Singles · Richmond Singles 3.5 Men

8 players · average NTRP 3.50 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2025-10-27vs 4 Lakeside Kings 3.5Lost 12
L#1 SinglesGuillermo Pardo vs Jesse Gauthier3-6, 1-6
L#2 SinglesJeremy Berteele vs Ian Horwitz2-6, 3-6
W#3 SinglesTodd Mungo vs Brian Cox7-5, 7-5
2025-10-22vs 2 MTC WinnerWon 21
W#1 SinglesTodd Milligan vs Michael Cousineau4-6, 6-0, 1-0
L#2 SinglesRichard Stowers vs Aaron Lawhorne3-6, 2-6
W#3 SinglesKristopher Johnson vs Michael May6-0, 6-1
2025-10-13vs 5 ACAC DennisLost 12
W#1 SinglesBrent Belding vs Ryland Dennis6-4, 6-2
L#2 SinglesTodd Milligan vs Anthony Forgey2-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#3 SinglesRichard Stowers vs Darren Golden6-1, 5-7, 0-1
2025-10-06vs 12 Burkwood Jones 3.5Lost 03
L#1 SinglesJesse Pasco vs Brady Smith5-7, 4-6
L#2 SinglesJeremy Berteele vs Blake Jones1-6, 0-6
L#3 SinglesRichard Stowers vs Brandon Malone0-6, 0-6
2025-10-04vs 10 Westwood BakerLost 12
L#1 SinglesJesse Pasco vs Daniel McCool2-6, 1-6
W#2 SinglesTodd Milligan vs Jarrett Williams6-2, 6-2
L#3 SinglesKristopher Johnson vs Garrett O'Shea1-6, 0-6
L#1 SinglesGuillermo Pardo vs Jeffrey Johnson6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L#2 SinglesJeremy Berteele vs Tucker Cole6-2, 4-6, 0-1
L#3 SinglesRichard Stowers vs Nick Coppola4-6, 5-7
2025-09-15vs 6 Chestnut Oaks 2.0 - CargiuloLost 12
L#1 SinglesBrent Belding vs Anthony Cargiulo4-6, 3-6
L#2 SinglesGuillermo Pardo vs Brandon Herrin4-6, 3-6
W#3 SinglesJesse Pasco vs Eric Grossman6-1, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Richmond Singles 3.5 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.21 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.47
Jesse Pasco
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #3 Singles 33% · published
3.39
Brent Belding
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3.5
3.31
Todd Mungo
usually #3 Singles 100% · published
3.30
Todd Milligan
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
3.23
Guillermo Pardo
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published
3.10
Jeremy Berteele
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
2.95
Richard Stowers
usually #3 Singles 63%, also #2 Singles 38% · published
2.93
Kristopher Johnson
usually #3 Singles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jesse Pasco + Guillermo Pardo4362% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jesse Pasco
21W–11L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%58%42%
3.47
3.5
Brent Belding
15W–9L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%78%22%
3.39
Todd Mungo
15W–9L career · 1 line in 2025
1%90%9%
3.31
Todd Milligan
18W–6L career · 3 lines in 2025
2%91%8%
3.30
Guillermo Pardo
9W–13L career · 3 lines in 2025
5%92%3%
3.23
Jeremy Berteele
24W–25L career · 3 lines in 2025
24%76%<1%
3.10
Richard Stowers
8W–19L career · 8 lines in 2025
<1%64%36%
2.95
Kristopher Johnson
17W–13L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%68%32%
2.93

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.