Teams

Benny and The Jets

2025 USTA MIXED 55 & OVER - IDAHO FALLS · MIXED 6.0- IDAHO FALLS

9 players · average NTRP 2.75 / IDAHO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2025-11-08vs Idaho/Boozer/55&Over6.0XLost 01
L#2 DoublesSharon Oliver / Blaine Johnson vs Alyce Brown / Bob Boozer Jr1-6, 1-6
2025-11-07vs Idaho/Boozer/55&Over6.0XLost 01
L#3 DoublesSharon Oliver / Blaine Johnson vs Kathy Kuhn / Darren Kuhn6-2, 2-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · MIXED 6.0- IDAHO FALLS
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Idaho/Boozer/55&Over6.0X40102664
2Benny and The Jets0421022130

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.50 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.92
Kimberly Wilson
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.83
Nadine Ball
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.64
Patrick Trimp
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
2.64
Ray Gordon
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.52
Kent Waddoups
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.48
Blaine Johnson
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
2.39
Karren Trimp
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
2.12
Sharon Oliver
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
1.92
Lois Slater
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 2.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Blaine Johnson + Sharon Oliver2540% gamesnot enough data
Nadine Ball + Ray Gordon1443% gamesnot enough data
Karren Trimp + Patrick Trimp134 matchesnot enough data
Kimberly Wilson + Patrick Trimp123 matchesnot enough data
Ray Gordon + Lois Slater033 matchesnot enough data
Kent Waddoups + Karren Trimp033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Kimberly Wilson
14W–50L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%71%29%
2.92
3
Nadine Ball
86W–110L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%87%12%
2.83
2.5
Patrick Trimp
16W–28L career · 3 lines in 2025
0%16%84%
2.64
3
Ray Gordon
54W–95L career · 3 lines in 2025
17%83%<1%
2.64
3
Kent Waddoups
68W–161L career · 3 lines in 2025
43%57%<1%
2.52
2.5
Blaine Johnson
29W–56L career · type A · 3 lines in 2025
0%55%45%
2.48
2.5
Karren Trimp
53W–97L career · 3 lines in 2025
0%79%21%
2.39
Sharon Oliver
12W–52L career · 2 lines in 2025
0%>99%<1%
2.12
2.5
Lois Slater
1W–18L career · type S · 2 lines in 2025
0%>99%<1%
1.92

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.