Teams

Idaho/Boozer/55&Over6.0X

2025 USTA MIXED 55 & OVER - IDAHO FALLS · MIXED 6.0- IDAHO FALLS

8 players · average NTRP 3.08 / IDAHO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2025-11-08vs Benny and The JetsWon 20
W#2 DoublesAlyce Brown / Bob Boozer Jr vs Karren Trimp / Blaine Johnson7-6, 1-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesCarrie Rose Lindley / Doug Lindley vs Lois Slater / Ray Gordon6-1, 6-2
2025-11-08vs Benny and The JetsWon 21
L#1 DoublesCarrie Rose Lindley / Doug Lindley vs Kimberly Wilson / Patrick Trimp6-2, 1-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesAlyce Brown / Bob Boozer Jr vs Sharon Oliver / Blaine Johnson6-1, 6-1
W#3 DoublesKathy Kuhn / Darren Kuhn vs Karren Trimp / Kent Waddoups6-3, 6-1
2025-11-07vs Benny and The JetsSplit 11
L#2 DoublesCarrie Rose Lindley / Doug Lindley vs Nadine Ball / Ray Gordon3-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#3 DoublesKathy Kuhn / Darren Kuhn vs Karren Trimp / Patrick Trimp6-1, 6-4
2025-11-07vs Benny and The JetsWon 20
W#2 DoublesAlyce Brown / Bob Boozer Jr vs Lois Slater / Kent Waddoups6-0, 6-0
W#3 DoublesKathy Kuhn / Darren Kuhn vs Sharon Oliver / Blaine Johnson2-6, 6-2, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · MIXED 6.0- IDAHO FALLS
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Idaho/Boozer/55&Over6.0X40102664
2Benny and The Jets0421022130

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.84 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.35
Darren Kuhn
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.08
Alyce Brown
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.04
Diane Poole
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
3.02
Carrie Rose Lindley
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.99
Neil Marion
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.24
Bob Boozer Jr
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
2.18
Kathy Kuhn
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Doug Lindley
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Alyce Brown + Bob Boozer Jr6070% games+11.8% vs expected
Diane Poole + Neil Marion9361% games+9.2% vs expected
Kathy Kuhn + Darren Kuhn20362% games+4.8% vs expected
Carrie Rose Lindley + Doug Lindley41637% games−16.9% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Darren Kuhn
290W–96L career · 3 lines in 2025
1%85%15%
3.35
3.5
Alyce Brown
28W–36L career · 3 lines in 2025
30%70%<1%
3.08
3
Diane Poole
191W–163L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%39%61%
3.04
3
Carrie Rose Lindley
49W–62L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%43%57%
3.02
3
Neil Marion
105W–114L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%54%46%
2.99
2.5
Bob Boozer Jr
133W–230L career · 3 lines in 2025
0%97%3%
2.24
Kathy Kuhn
27W–34L career · 3 lines in 2025
0%99%1%
2.18
Doug Lindley
13W–60L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.