Teams

Indy CX 6.5 MTC Moore

Fall USTA Central Indiana Combo Mixed · CIN Indy Adult Combo Mixed 6.5

10 players · average NTRP 3.00 / CENTRAL INDIANA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Flight standings7 teams · CIN Indy Adult Combo Mixed 6.5
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Indy CX 6.5 IRCD Copeland000000
2Indy CX 6.5 CRC Kennedy000000
3Indy CX 6.5 IRCD Jackson000000
4Indy CX 6.5 MTC Moore000000
5Indy CX 6.5 IRCD Aung000000
6Indy CX 6.5 IRCD Chien000000
7Indy CX 6.5 IHP Laird000000

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.95 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.11
Katherine Boehm
published
3.04
Heidi Arnold
published
3.01
David Katz
published 3
2.98
Chris Ficklin
published 3
2.97
Chris Delp
published 3
2.87
Tara Moore
published
2.86
Abigail Katz
published 3
Delaney Williams
published 3
2.73
Emily Shumaker
published
Tyson Thompson
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

David Katz + Abigail Katz16556% gamesnot enough data
Chris Delp + Heidi Arnold7457% gamesnot enough data
Katherine Boehm + Chris Delp5167% gamesnot enough data
Tara Moore + Chris Delp0534% gamesnot enough data
Tara Moore + Tyson Thompson213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Katherine Boehm
87W–32L career · no lines in 2026
<1%21%79%
3.11
Heidi Arnold
69W–27L career · no lines in 2026
<1%39%61%
3.04
3
David Katz
20W–8L career · type S · no lines in 2026
<1%47%53%
3.01
3
Chris Ficklin
37W–17L career · no lines in 2026
<1%56%44%
2.98
3
Chris Delp
54W–53L career · no lines in 2026
<1%58%42%
2.97
Tara Moore
56W–57L career · no lines in 2026
<1%82%18%
2.87
3
Abigail Katz
20W–6L career · no lines in 2026
<1%83%16%
2.86
3
Delaney Williams
12W–17L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Emily Shumaker
9W–4L career · no lines in 2026
5%92%2%
2.73
Tyson Thompson
12W–3L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.