Teams

OC Dana Hills TC - Devon

2022 USTA Adult 40 & Over WEEKDAY WOMEN · OC 4.0W

13 players · average NTRP 4.00 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2022-03-11vs OC FVTC - Susie RuizLost 01
L#2 DoublesDevon Hogue / Nina Berry vs Mary Huang / Chunyan Chen4-6, 6-4, 0-1
2022-02-25Won 20
W#2 DoublesKelly Dishno / Devon Hogue vs Michelle Bachand / Tonianne Southron7-5, 5-1
W#3 DoublesAmy Cramer / Nina Berry vs Sarah King / Erica Shin6-0, 6-2
2022-02-04vs OC Lifetime RSC - BevWon 20
W#2 DoublesDevon Hogue / Lori McFerren vs Marianne Richards / Janice Trojan6-3, 6-4
W#3 DoublesAmy Cramer / Nina Berry vs Bev Merwin / Patty Podley6-3, 6-4
2022-01-28vs OC LLW YLCC - IreneLost 01
L#2 DoublesDevon Hogue / Carrie Anderson vs Kathy Schaefer / Ramona Chuang7-6, 3-6, 0-1
2022-01-21vs OC Lifetime SC - KellyWon 20
W#1 DoublesDevon Hogue / Lori McFerren vs Kelly Stacy / Jane Doe6-2, 6-0
W#3 DoublesAmy Cramer / Nina Berry vs Christine Griffith / Missy Berchiolli4-6, 7-5, 1-0
2022-01-14vs OC LNRC - NinaWon 10
W#2 DoublesDevon Hogue / Lori McFerren vs Renee Carlson / Luna Qingyue Cai6-2, 7-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for OC 4.0W have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.70 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.15
Nina Berry
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4.5
4.07
Devon Hogue
usually #2 Doubles 83%, also #1 Doubles 17% · published 4
3.93
Lori McFerren
published
3.74
Carrie Anderson
published 4
3.71
Kelly Dishno
published
3.63
Denise Banks
published 4
3.61
Jenny Tetley
published
3.60
Michelle Haghani
published
3.52
Christy Dozor
published 4
3.52
Amy Cramer
published 4
3.23
Holly Ferber
published 3.5
Lori Reimers
published
Valerie Stam
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Devon Hogue + Nina Berry9460% gamesnot enough data
Lori McFerren + Nina Berry213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Nina Berry
112W–64L career · 4 lines in 2022
13%87%<1%
4.15
4
Devon Hogue
73W–48L career · 6 lines in 2022
<1%28%72%
4.07
Lori McFerren
24W–11L career · no lines in 2022
<1%71%29%
3.93
4
Carrie Anderson
0W–3L career · no lines in 2022
3%95%2%
3.74
Kelly Dishno
8W–3L career · no lines in 2022
5%94%1%
3.71
4
Denise Banks
7W–19L career · no lines in 2022
17%83%<1%
3.63
Jenny Tetley
5W–3L career · no lines in 2022
21%79%<1%
3.61
Michelle Haghani
4W–7L career · no lines in 2022
21%79%<1%
3.60
4
Christy Dozor
5W–5L career · no lines in 2022
44%55%<1%
3.52
4
Amy Cramer
2W–2L career · no lines in 2022
45%55%<1%
3.52
3.5
Holly Ferber
5W–7L career · no lines in 2022
4%94%2%
3.23
Lori Reimers
1W–0L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Valerie Stam
0W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.