Teams

OC Lifetime RSC - Bev

2022 USTA Adult 40 & Over WEEKDAY WOMEN · OC 4.0W

10 players · average NTRP 3.79 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2022-04-08Lost 01
L#2 DoublesMarianne Richards / Janice Trojan vs Terry Ward / Ali Razin6-7, 0-6
2022-03-11vs OC NBTC - GiannaWon 10
W#2 DoublesPatty Podley / Marianne Richards vs Gianna Marchal / Laura Xu6-2, 6-1
2022-02-25vs OC LNRC - NinaLost 01
L#2 DoublesStaci Howren / Janice Trojan vs Anne Marie Risquez-Tomasyan / Courtney Zani5-7, 4-6
2022-02-18vs OC LLW YLCC - IreneLost 01
L#1 DoublesNina Ames / Marianne Richards vs Marianne Provenzano / Susan Barrett1-6, 1-6
2022-02-11vs OC Lifetime SC - KellyWon 10
W#1 SinglesMarianne Richards vs Michelle Frohlich6-4, 6-2
2022-02-04vs OC Dana Hills TC - DevonLost 01
L#2 DoublesMarianne Richards / Janice Trojan vs Devon Hogue / Lori McFerren3-6, 4-6
2022-01-28vs OC FVTC - Susie RuizSplit 11
W#1 SinglesMarianne Richards vs Stacy Tzur6-2, 6-2
L#2 DoublesStaci Howren / Janice Trojan vs Keri Long / Arison Hong6-3, 3-6, 0-1
2022-01-21vs OC Great Park - Nan Diesen-NgWon 10
W#2 DoublesKathleen Waite / Marianne Richards vs Lily Yu / Kim Kurisu2-6, 6-2, 1-0
2022-01-14vs OC Huntington Club - JoWon 10
W#2 DoublesPatty Podley / Marianne Richards vs Ida Shu / Tricia Getty6-3, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for OC 4.0W have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.64 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.08
3.87
Annette Drake
published 4
3.83
Marianne Richards
usually #2 Doubles 63%, also #1 Singles 25% · published 4
3.70
Patty Podley
published
3.63
Janice Trojan
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.61
Sonia Bishop
published
3.51
Nina Ames
published
3.50
Bev Merwin
published 3.5
3.48
JILL ESLICK
published 3.5
3.20
Darcy Kendrick
published 3.5
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Christine Reenders
12W–7L career · no lines in 2022
<1%27%73%
4.08
4
Annette Drake
7W–1L career · no lines in 2022
<1%85%15%
3.87
4
Marianne Richards
98W–77L career · 8 lines in 2022
1%90%9%
3.83
Patty Podley
2W–2L career · no lines in 2022
6%93%1%
3.70
4
Janice Trojan
27W–39L career · 4 lines in 2022
17%83%<1%
3.63
Sonia Bishop
3W–3L career · no lines in 2022
20%80%<1%
3.61
Nina Ames
2W–3L career · no lines in 2022
48%52%<1%
3.51
3.5
Bev Merwin
1W–6L career · no lines in 2022
<1%52%48%
3.50
3.5
JILL ESLICK
3W–6L career · no lines in 2022
<1%58%42%
3.48
3.5
Darcy Kendrick
9W–9L career · no lines in 2022
6%93%1%
3.20

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.