Teams

OC Huntington Club - Jo

2022 USTA Adult 40 & Over WEEKDAY WOMEN · OC 4.0W

9 players · average NTRP 4.12 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2022-04-01vs OC LLW YLCC - IreneSplit 11
L#1 DoublesIda Shu / Kelly Lombardo vs Marianne Provenzano / Cyndi Nguyen6-3, 2-6, 0-1
W#1 SinglesEmalyn Anthony vs Kim Byrens6-0, 7-5
2022-03-17vs OC Lifetime SC - KellyWon 10
W#1 SinglesEmalyn Anthony vs Ladawn Stone6-1, 6-3
2022-02-18vs OC MVTC - DianaSplit 11
W#1 SinglesEmalyn Anthony vs Marzy Troutman6-2, 6-1
L#2 DoublesIda Shu / Rosalinda Fazio vs Terri Hamm / Sayuri Maruna3-6, 2-6
2022-02-11vs OC Great Park - Nan Diesen-NgLost 01
L#1 DoublesEmalyn Anthony / Teri Springer vs Su Prijyanonda / Paula Nishibayashi3-6, 2-6
2022-02-04vs OC LNRC - NinaWon 20
W#1 DoublesIda Shu / Kelly Lombardo vs Kristen Peay / Luna Qingyue Cai6-2, 4-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesEmalyn Anthony vs Amy Berk6-1, 6-1
2022-01-28vs OC NBTC - GiannaWon 20
W#1 DoublesAngie Karahalios / Ida Shu vs Jennifer Czech / Rikki Scharnell6-3, 4-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesEmalyn Anthony vs Carrie Morton6-0, 6-2
2022-01-21vs OC FVTC - Susie RuizWon 20
W#1 SinglesEmalyn Anthony vs Mina Whitlock6-0, 6-2
W#3 DoublesTonianne Southron / Rosalinda Fazio vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2022-01-14vs OC Lifetime RSC - BevSplit 11
W#1 SinglesEmalyn Anthony vs Darcy Kendrick6-1, 6-1
L#2 DoublesIda Shu / Tricia Getty vs Patty Podley / Marianne Richards3-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for OC 4.0W have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.68 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.18
Emalyn Anthony
usually #1 Singles 88%, also #1 Doubles 13% · published 4.5
3.81
Cheryl Gates
published 4
3.71
Ida Shu
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.60
Kelly Lombardo
published
3.53
Rosalinda Fazio
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.52
Jill Muranaka
published
3.42
Josephine Garrett
published
Mary Amen
published
Nerie Ivers
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Emalyn Anthony + Ida Shu3351% gamesnot enough data
Josephine Garrett + Kelly Lombardo044 matchesnot enough data
Rosalinda Fazio + Ida Shu123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Emalyn Anthony
107W–57L career · 8 lines in 2022
8%91%1%
4.18
4
Cheryl Gates
16W–12L career · no lines in 2022
1%92%8%
3.81
4
Ida Shu
61W–66L career · 5 lines in 2022
5%94%1%
3.71
Kelly Lombardo
0W–4L career · no lines in 2022
23%77%<1%
3.60
4
Rosalinda Fazio
96W–130L career · 2 lines in 2022
41%59%<1%
3.53
Jill Muranaka
2W–8L career · no lines in 2022
42%58%<1%
3.52
Josephine Garrett
7W–19L career · no lines in 2022
73%27%<1%
3.42
Mary Amen
0W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Nerie Ivers
0W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.